Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Skin care products and subtle data manipulation.

Ronni Wolf1, Edith Orion, Batya Davidovici

  • 1The Dermatology Unit, Kaplan Medical Center, Rechovot, Israel. wolf_r@netvision.net.il

Clinics in Dermatology
|March 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Association Between Alopecia Areata and Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Large-Scale Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Therapies for Solar Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Eponyms and clinical entities from the land of Israel.

Clinics in dermatology·2023
Same author

Mycosis Fungoides in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

The Granulated Sweetener Packet Sign.

Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC·2023
Same author

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors for prolonged secondary prevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients.

Dermatologic therapy·2022

Dermatologists must critically evaluate skincare product data, as scientific testing methods can be manipulated. True product superiority for patient needs requires unbiased, real-world efficacy assessment beyond published data.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Cosmetic Science
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Dermatologists require skills to guide patients in selecting skincare products.
  • Physicians and scientists rely on peer-reviewed data, including numbers, tables, and graphs.
  • The reliability of sophisticated product testing and its relevance to patient needs are questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To question the universal superiority of products based solely on sophisticated tests.
  • To assess the trustworthiness of data presented in scientific publications regarding skincare.
  • To highlight the lack of standardized, unbiased evaluation methods for skincare product efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the absence of a generally accepted methodology for unbiased skincare product evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the lack of consensus on test methods that reflect real-life product performance.
  • Examination of how study design, protocols, techniques, and endpoints can be manipulated to favor specific products.

    • Main Results:

    • Scientific and objective data can be manipulated to support product claims.
    • There is no consensus on the best methods for evaluating real-life skincare product performance.
    • Study designs can be adapted to emphasize a product's specific advantages.

    Conclusions:

    • The efficacy and performance data of skincare products require critical appraisal.
    • Objective measurement and scientific data do not always guarantee product superiority or suitability for patients.
    • Understanding potential biases in testing is crucial for dermatologists and consumers.