Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implicit probabilistic sequence learning is independent of explicit awareness.

Sunbin Song1, James H Howard, Darlene V Howard

  • 1Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. sss35@georgetown.edu

Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
|March 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Explicit knowledge does not affect implicit motor sequence learning, though it may interfere early in training. This study clarifies previous mixed results on learning interactions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial inhibition of return is impaired in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Identifying perfusion deficits on CT perfusion images using temporal similarity perfusion (TSP) mapping.

European radiology·2019
Same author

Temporal similarity perfusion mapping: A standardized and model-free method for detecting perfusion deficits in stroke.

PloS one·2017
Same author

Individual Differences in Cognitive Function in Older Adults Predicted by Neuronal Selectivity at Corresponding Brain Regions.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2017
Same author

Clinical Results and Survivorship of the GENESIS II Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum of 15 Years.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2017
Same author

Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Implicit Learning but Enhanced Relational Memory and Executive Functioning in Young Adults.

PloS one·2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Learning

Background:

  • Interactions between explicit and implicit motor sequence learning are complex, with prior studies showing mixed results.
  • Difficulties in isolating implicit learning have contributed to discrepancies in understanding these interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of explicit knowledge on implicit motor sequence learning.
  • To clarify previous discrepant findings regarding the interplay between explicit and implicit learning.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a modified Alternating Serial Response Time (ASRT) task, a probabilistic sequence learning paradigm.
  • Employed continuous and pure measures of implicit learning to assess the impact of explicit knowledge.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Implicit motor sequence learning occurred independently of explicit knowledge.
  • Explicit knowledge showed some evidence of interfering with the expression of implicit learning during early training phases.
  • Reaction time and accuracy measures demonstrated dissociations, being differentially affected by explicit knowledge.

Conclusions:

  • Implicit sequence learning operates independently of explicit knowledge.
  • Explicit knowledge may interfere with the early expression of implicit learning, explaining prior conflicting results.
  • Differential effects on reaction time and accuracy highlight the complex relationship between explicit and implicit learning processes.