Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

IAEA/IDEAS intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment.

H Doerfel1, A Andrasi, R Cruz-Suárez

  • 1Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany. info@idea-system.com

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|March 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Proton-Induced Cross Sections on a Stored Rare Ion Beam: Measurement of ^{118}Te(p,γ) for Explosive Nucleosynthesis.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Nuclear Astrophysics in the Storage Ring: Background Suppressed Simultaneous Measurement of (p,γ) and (p,n) Reactions.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

First Direct Measurement of the 64.5 keV Resonance Strength in the ^{17}O(p,γ)^{18}F Reaction.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Measurement of the Isolated Nuclear Two-Photon Decay in ^{72}Ge.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Core protocol for the adaptive Platform Trial In COVID-19 Vaccine priming and BOOsting (PICOBOO).

Trials·2023
Same author

Large-scale individual monitoring of internal contamination by gamma-emitting radionuclides in nuclear accident scenarios.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2019
Same journal

Development of CaSO4: Dy-based ring badge for extremity dose monitoring of radiation workers in India.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A proposal for a differentiated radiation protection program for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the operation of nuclear power plants.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A three-dimensional neutron localization method based on double-scattering imaging and reconstruction algorithm.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Effect of 131I biodistribution on measurements using a scanning whole-body counter.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Activity concentration of 137Cs and natural radionuclides in soil around the Belarusian nuclear power plant in the pre-commissioning period.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Novel passive-adaptive exoskeleton-supported radiation protection equipment with enhanced shielding and reduced perceived weight.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
See all related articles

An international exercise assessed occupational radiation exposure using new guidelines. The study found these guidelines improve dose assessment consistency among participants worldwide.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Protection
  • Occupational Health
  • Nuclear Science

Background:

  • Assessing internal radiation dose is crucial for occupational health.
  • Standardized methods are needed for consistent dose assessment.
  • The IDEAS group developed general guidelines for internal dose assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the applicability of the IDEAS 'General Guidelines for the Assessment of Internal Dose from Monitoring Data'.
  • To assess occupational exposure due to radionuclide intake using an internet-based intercomparison.
  • To determine the impact of the guidelines on dose assessment harmonization.

Main Methods:

  • An internet-based intercomparison exercise was conducted.
  • Six radionuclide intake cases were presented online.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eighty-one participants globally submitted their dose assessment solutions.
  • Main Results:

    • The guidelines positively influenced the methodologies used for dose assessments.
    • Correct application of the guidelines improved the harmonization of assessed doses.
    • The exercise demonstrated the practical utility of the developed guidelines.

    Conclusions:

    • The IDEAS guidelines are effective in standardizing internal dose assessment methodologies.
    • The guidelines contribute to more consistent and harmonized occupational dose evaluations.
    • Internet-based intercomparisons are valuable tools for guideline validation and dissemination.