Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching

Darryl W Schneider1, Gordon D Logan

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. darryl.schneider@vanderbilt.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Order is ordinal in serial memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

It was 40 years ago today: Reflections "On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method" by Logan et al. (1984).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

An Investigation of Attentional Networks, the Locus Coeruleus - Norepinephrine System, and Autism and ADHD Traits.

Journal of attention disorders·2025
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study refines task-switching research by separating cue and task transitions. Findings show that both higher-order task sequences and cue transitions significantly impact performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Measuring task-switch costs is complex due to confounds between cue and task switching.
  • Previous methods like transition-cuing partially addressed these issues but introduced new confounds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate sequential effects in task switching by partially deconfounding cue transitions and task sequences.
  • To examine how higher-order task transitions and cue transitions independently affect performance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a modified transition-cuing procedure with two cues per transition type (repetitions and switches).
  • Designed experiments to isolate the effects of cue transitions while holding task sequences constant, and vice versa.
  • Analyzed performance based on cue and task transition types in a factorial design.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated robust sequential effects in task-switching performance.
  • Found that higher-order task transitions influenced performance even when cue transitions were controlled.
  • Observed that cue transitions affected performance when task sequences were controlled.

Conclusions:

  • The refined methodology successfully dissociates cue and task transition effects.
  • Sequential effects in task switching are influenced by both task history and cue history.
  • Findings have significant implications for understanding cognitive control and task switching mechanisms.