Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?
T Vatnaland1, J Vatnaland, S Friis
1Department of Acute Psychiatry, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. tovatna@online.no
Objective:
The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has been considered as a reliable tool. However, most studies of GAF reliability have been based on special conditions, such as prior training and test awareness. This study takes a different approach investigating inter-rater reliability of GAF scores in a routine clinical context.
Method:
Eighty-two consecutively admitted acute psychiatric patients were rated according to routine department procedures and by two researchers at admission and discharge. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were computed using two-way mixed models.
Results:
Inter-rater reliability between routine scores and research scores were low (ICC coefficients between r = 0.39 and 0.59). Inter-rater reliability between the two researchers were excellent (ICC coefficients r = 0.81 and 0.85).
Conclusion:
Inter-rater reliability of GAF scores in a routine clinical context seems to be insufficient.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Reliability and Validity
01:25Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
01:25Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...