Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve01:29

Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve

Sight distance on vertical curves is critical in roadway design. It ensures drivers can see far enough ahead to identify and respond to hazards effectively. This directly impacts safety, driver comfort, and the overall efficiency of the transportation network.Vertical curves are classified into crest and sag curves based on their geometry. For crest curves, sight distance is determined by the line of sight between a driver's eye and a small object on the road's surface. Design parameters for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adenosine as a modulator of human islet function and hypoxic tolerance.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Intelligent SERS sensing strategy based on Ag NP fractal networks and gradient kernel size CNN for high-precision sweat monitoring.

Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy·2026
Same author

Nicotine-Mediated Redox and Nitrosative Stress in Cardiorenal Health.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026
Same author

Wearable Optical Fiber SERS Sensor Based on a Flexible "Hydrogel Tentacle" for Sweat Remote and In Situ Detection.

ACS sensors·2026
Same author

Advertising of orthodontic appliances on websites in the UK: Do they comply with advertising standards? A cross-sectional study.

Journal of orthodontics·2026
Same author

Disulfiram metabolite Cu(DDC)<sub>2</sub> enhances radionuclide uptake in vivo revealing insights into tumoural ablation resistance.

EBioMedicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality
06:54

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality

Published on: June 27, 2025

Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality.

J Edward Swan1, Adam Jones, Eric Kolstad

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute for Neurocognitive Science and Technology, Mississippi State University, Butler Hall 39762, USA. swan@acm.org

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
|March 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study investigates augmented reality (AR) depth perception, finding that AR users may overestimate distant objects but underestimate near ones. Special conditions like "x-ray vision" significantly impact spatial judgment accuracy.

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality
06:54

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality

Published on: June 27, 2025

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Vision
  • Perception Psychology

Background:

  • Optical see-through augmented reality (AR) systems face challenges in accurately representing spatial layout and depth.
  • Ensuring users perceive virtual graphics in consistent spatial relationships with real-world objects is crucial for AR development.
  • AR enables novel perceptual capabilities, such as 'x-ray vision,' requiring accurate depth perception for virtual objects behind real-world occlusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and discuss protocols for measuring egocentric depth judgments in virtual and augmented environments.
  • To investigate depth underestimation commonly observed in virtual environments.
  • To experimentally measure egocentric depth judgments in AR across different distances and conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment I utilized a perceptual matching protocol to assess AR depth judgments from 5 to 45 meters, examining visual field location, 'x-ray vision,' and practice effects.
  • Experiment II employed blind walking and verbal reports to measure AR depth judgments between 3 and 7 meters, comparing real, virtual, and mixed objects.
  • Protocols reviewed include those for measuring egocentric depth in both virtual reality (VR) and AR settings.

Main Results:

  • Experiment I indicated a bias shift, with AR depth judgments switching from underestimation to overestimation around 23 meters.
  • The 'x-ray vision' condition in Experiment I was found to significantly increase task difficulty.
  • Experiment II results suggest egocentric depth in AR is underestimated at near distances (3-7m), though less so than in typical VR environments.

Conclusions:

  • AR depth perception exhibits complex behavior, including a distance-dependent shift in judgment bias.
  • Factors such as restricted field-of-view and limited scanning strategies may contribute to depth underestimation in AR at near distances.
  • Understanding and mitigating depth perception errors are essential for developing effective and intuitive AR experiences.