Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling the disruptive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses' supply and wages.

Frontiers in epidemiology·2026
Same author

Modelling assessment of epidemiological strategies based on self-screening tools.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Uncertainty Aware Decision Support with Computationally Expensive Simulation Models: A Case Study of HIV Intervention Scenarios.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Evaluation via simulation of statistical corrections for network nonindependence.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2025
Same author

Cognitively-plausible reinforcement learning in epidemiological agent-based simulations.

Frontiers in epidemiology·2025
Same author

Analysis of travel-time to HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa reveals inequities in access to antiretrovirals.

Communications medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Theory versus data: how to calculate R0?

Romulus Breban1, Raffaele Vardavas, Sally Blower

  • 1The Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Plos One
|March 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The basic reproduction number (R(0)) may not accurately predict epidemic thresholds. Calculating R(0) from individual-level models reveals discrepancies, potentially leading to flawed outbreak control strategies.

More Related Videos

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies
09:37

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Published on: January 19, 2022

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies
09:37

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Published on: January 19, 2022

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Mathematical Modeling
  • Infectious Disease Dynamics

Background:

  • The basic reproduction number (R(0)) is crucial for predicting infectious disease outbreak severity and guiding control interventions.
  • Conventionally, R(0) > 1 suggests an epidemic, while R(0) < 1 indicates extinction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the basic reproduction number (R(0)) accurately represents an epidemic threshold parameter.
  • To compare R(0) values derived from population-level models versus individual-level models (ILMs).

Main Methods:

  • Developed and utilized a novel individual-level model (ILM) linked to a population-level model.
  • Employed computational and analytical methods to calculate the average number of secondary infections (R(0)) directly from the ILM.
  • Compared R(0) derived from ILM with epidemic threshold parameters from traditional population-level models.

Main Results:

  • The R(0) calculated from the ILM significantly differed from the epidemic threshold derived from the population-level model.
  • Identified that diverse individual-level processes can yield identical incidence and prevalence patterns.
  • Demonstrated that using empirical R(0) from contact tracing in population models can lead to misleading control estimates.

Conclusions:

  • The basic reproduction number (R(0)) may not reliably function as a universal epidemic threshold parameter.
  • R(0) derived from population-level models or contact tracing may not accurately reflect true epidemic potential.
  • Misleading R(0) estimates can compromise assessments of pathogen infectiousness, outbreak severity, and intervention effectiveness.