Obligations, internalization, and excuse making: integrating the triangle model and self-determination theory
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Alternative In Vitro Methods for the Determination of Viral Capsid Structural Integrity
Published on: November 16, 2017
Kennon M Sheldon1, Todd R Schachtman
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia 65211, USA. SheldonK@Missouri.edu
Abstract:
Schlenker's triangle model (Schlenker, Britt, Pennington, Murphy, & Doherty, 1994, Schlenker, Pontari, & Christopher, 2001) identifies three excuses people use to avoid taking responsibility after failure: that one had no control in the situation, that the obligation was unclear, and that it was not really one's obligation. Three retrospective studies tested the presumed negative association between excuse making and responsibility taking. The studies also examined the effects of self-determination theory's concept of motivational internalization (Deci & Ryan, 2000) upon these variables. A complex but replicable pattern emerged, such that responsibility taking and motivational internalization correlated with adaptive outcomes such as future commitment and positive expectancy and excuse making did not. Of particular interest, perceiving that the person levying the obligation internalized motivation predicted responsibility taking, in all three studies. Implications for the triangle model, as well as for theories of maturity and personality development, are considered.
Related Concept Videos
Trigonometry of Right Triangles
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who...
Band Theory
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...
Scientific Laws and Theories
Molecular Orbital Theory II

