Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

Longitudinal Research

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Analysis of 21 Apiospora genomes reveals a genus with tremendous synthesis potential for carbohydrate-active enzymes and secondary metabolites.

BMC genomics·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Combined inhibition of BET family proteins and histone deacetylases as a potential epigenetics-based therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Nature medicine·2026

Same author

Pass/Fail Versus Tiered Grades and Academic Performance in Undergraduate Medical Education: Crossover Study.

JMIR medical education·2025

Same author

Differences in complement activation of serum-resistant and serum-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.

Molecular immunology·2025

Same author

Gold(I) <i>N</i>-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes as Ferroptosis Inducing Anticancer Agents.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2025

Same author

Porphyrin-Derived Carbon Dots for Red-Light Activated Photodynamic Therapy of Breast Cancer.

ACS applied bio materials·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Detection of Homologous Recombination Intermediates via Proximity Ligation and Quantitative PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Detection of Homologous Recombination Intermediates via Proximity Ligation and Quantitative PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: September 11, 2022

Discarding duplicate ditags in LongSAGE analysis may introduce significant error.

Jeppe Emmersen¹, Anna M Heidenblut, Annabeth Laursen Høgh

¹Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. je@bio.aau.dk <je@bio.aau.dk>

BMC Bioinformatics

|March 16, 2007

Summary

Removing duplicate ditags in Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) is often unnecessary and introduces significant errors in LongSAGE analysis. New algorithms can identify true artifact ditags for accurate gene expression profiling.

More Related Videos

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Detection of Homologous Recombination Intermediates via Proximity Ligation and Quantitative PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Detection of Homologous Recombination Intermediates via Proximity Ligation and Quantitative PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: September 11, 2022

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Genomics
Bioinformatics

Background:

Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) involves removing duplicate ditags, presumed artifacts, during analysis.
This removal process can eliminate naturally occurring duplicate ditags, leading to measurement errors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the necessity of removing all duplicate ditags in SAGE and LongSAGE analysis.
To develop and apply an algorithm for analyzing ditag populations and identifying artifact ditags.

Main Methods:

Development of a novel algorithm to analyze the differential occurrence of SAGE tags within ditag combinations.
Application of the algorithm to a pancreatic acinar cell LongSAGE library and ten additional LongSAGE libraries.
Comparative analysis of error introduced by duplicate ditag removal in SAGE versus LongSAGE.

Main Results:

Analysis revealed no general amplification bias justifying the removal of all duplicate ditags in the studied LongSAGE libraries.
Removal of duplicate ditags introduced insignificant errors in SAGE but up to 3-fold errors in LongSAGE.
The developed algorithm successfully identified artifact ditags originating from nucleotide variations and vector contamination.

Conclusions:

The routine removal of all duplicate ditags is unfounded for the analyzed datasets and introduces substantial errors, particularly in LongSAGE.
This practice may lead to similar errors in other existing LongSAGE datasets.
Ditag population analysis is crucial for identifying and managing artifact tags, ensuring more accurate gene expression data.