Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?

Gina S Lovasi1, Jeremy C Weiss, Richard Hoskins

  • 1Columbia University, Institute of Social and Economic Research and Policy, New York, NY, USA. gl2225@columbia.edu

International Journal of Health Geographics
|March 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rare Exome Sequence Variants in CLCN6 Reduce Blood Pressure Levels and Hypertension Risk.

Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics·2015
Same author

The association of F11 genetic variants with the risk of incident venous thrombosis among women, by statin use.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2015
Same author

Genome-wide gene-environment interactions on quantitative traits using family data.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2015
Same author

Novel Genetic Loci Associated With Retinal Microvascular Diameter.

Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics·2015
Same author

A meta-analysis of 120 246 individuals identifies 18 new loci for fibrinogen concentration.

Human molecular genetics·2015
Same author

Case-control study of oral glucose-lowering drugs in combination with long-acting insulin and the risks of incident myocardial infarction and incident stroke.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2015

The multi-stage geocoding method offers a higher match rate for spatial epidemiology studies compared to the single-stage approach. Differences in geocoding accuracy are more pronounced in sparsely populated, low-poverty areas.

Area of Science:

  • Spatial Epidemiology
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Background:

  • Geocoding methods vary in spatial epidemiology, potentially impacting study validity due to errors and differential match rates.
  • Comparing geocoding approaches is crucial for reliable spatial health research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and performance of a multi-stage geocoding method versus a single-stage method.
  • To identify factors influencing geocoding discordance between methods.

Main Methods:

  • Two geocoding methods (multi-stage and single-stage) were applied to 8,157 Washington State addresses.
  • Address locations from both methods were compared, measuring distances between assigned coordinates.
  • Area-level census data were used to model predictors of geocoding discordance.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The multi-stage method achieved a higher match rate (99%) than the single-stage method (95%).
  • For addresses matched by both methods, 96% fell within the same census tract, and 98% were within 1 km.
  • Geocoding discrepancies were greater in sparsely populated and low-poverty areas.

Conclusions:

  • The multi-stage geocoding method demonstrates superior performance with a higher match rate.
  • The choice of geocoding method significantly impacts study results, particularly in areas with lower population density and poverty levels.