Comparative study of six different sludges by sequential speciation of heavy metals

The presence of heavy metals in the sludges produced in wastewater treatment plants restricts their use for agricultural purposes. This study looks at different types of sludge (aerobic, anaerobic, unstabilised, sludge from a waste stabilisation pond, sludge from an extended aeration plant and heat treated sludge) and compares the distribution of heavy metals with the treatment that they have undergone. In addition, the total quantity of metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ca, K, Fe, Mg, Ni, Na, Pb and Zn) and some agronomic parameters necessary for characterising a sludge as suitable for use as amendment were determined. The BCR method for heavy metal speciation was followed. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied in order to obtain more information about metal speciation in the sewage sludges. It was confirmed that the concentration of heavy metals did not exceed the limits set out by European legislation and that the stabilisation treatment undergone by the sludges strongly influenced the heavy metal distribution and the phases to which they were associated. The waste stabilisation pond sludge, which has undergone a higher degree of mineralisation than the others, shows a lower metal bioavailability index since practically all the heavy metals in it are associated to the oxidisable and residual fraction. On the other hand the unstabilised sludge, which, along with that exposed to extended aeration, contains the highest accumulations of heavy metals in the most easily assimilable fractions.