Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Septic shock: from recommendations to bedside].

A Lepape1

  • 1Service d'anesthésie-réanimation-I, CHU Lyon-Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Benite cedex, France. alain.lepape@chu-lyon.fr

Annales Francaises D'Anesthesie Et De Reanimation
|March 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated surveillance in French ICUs: is it feasible? Results from a survey in French ICUs participating in a surveillance network.

The Journal of hospital infection·2021
Same author

Exogenous acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units: a prospective multi-centre study (DYNAPYO study).

The Journal of hospital infection·2019
Same author

Antibioprophylaxis in surgery and interventional medicine (adult patients). Update 2017.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2019
Same author

Antibiotic use and good practice in 314 French hospitals: The 2010 SPA2 prevalence study.

Medecine et maladies infectieuses·2015
Same author

Risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition in intensive care units: a prospective multicentre study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2014
Same author

Vascular catheter-related infection claims to health insurance company: often preventable.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2014

Managing septic shock involves complex, time-sensitive procedures, increasing medical error risks. This analysis reviews tools like guidelines and checklists to aid physicians in septic shock patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Medical error analysis
  • Clinical decision support

Context:

  • Septic shock management is complex and time-constrained.
  • High risk of medical errors in critical care settings.
  • Need for standardized tools in emergency medicine.

Purpose:

  • To critically analyze tools aiding septic shock management.
  • Evaluate the utility of guidelines, clinical paths, algorithms, and checklists.
  • Improve physician decision-making in septic shock.

Summary:

  • Analysis of decision-support tools for septic shock.
  • Includes guidelines, clinical pathways, algorithms, and checklists.
  • Focuses on reducing medical errors in time-sensitive situations.

Related Experiment Videos

Impact:

  • Potential to reduce medical errors in septic shock.
  • Enhances physician performance in critical care.
  • Promotes evidence-based practice in emergency settings.