Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026
13:44
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Process evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the project P.A.T.H.S
Daniel T L Shek1, Hing Keung Ma, Joyce H Y Lui
1Quality of Life Centre, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. danielshek@cuhk.edu.hk
Thescientificworldjournal
|March 21, 2007
Summary
The Project P.A.T.H.S. Tier 1 Program demonstrated high implementation quality, with an average adherence rate of 84.5%. This indicates successful program delivery across observed areas, supporting its effectiveness in participating schools.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Program Evaluation
- School Interventions
Background:
- Project P.A.T.H.S. aims to improve student well-being and academic success.
- Effective implementation is crucial for the success of school-based programs.
- Understanding the quality of program delivery is essential for evidence-based practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S.
- To assess program adherence and identify areas of high-quality delivery.
- To provide empirical support for the program's practical application.
Main Methods:
- Process evaluation conducted through systematic observations.
- Observations focused on 12 units across six randomly selected schools.
- Two independent observers ensured reliable data collection.
Main Results:
- Overall program adherence was high, averaging 84.5% (range 50%-95%).
- High implementation quality was noted in student engagement, motivation, and instructor preparedness.
- Positive indicators included classroom control, interactive delivery, and achievement of objectives.
Conclusions:
- The Tier 1 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S. is implemented with high quality.
- Findings support the program's successful integration into school settings.
- The study validates the program's adherence and effectiveness in practice.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...
01:26Methods of Documentation II: POMR
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
01:30Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is a science-based, preventive system used globally to ensure food safety by identifying, evaluating, and controlling biological, chemical, and physical hazards throughout food production. Originally developed by NASA and the Pillsbury Company for astronaut food, HACCP is now a core component of the Codex Alimentarius.HACCP operates on prerequisite programs—such as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), sanitation procedures, and supplier...
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes: