Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 protocols
1Institute for the Study of Interpersonal Violence. tpinsoneault@neo.rr.com
Abstract:
The ability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; J. N. Butcher et al., 2001) validity scales to detect random, partially random, and nonrandom MMPI-2 protocols was investigated. Investigations included the Variable Response Inconsistency scale (VRIN), F, several potentially useful new F and VRIN subscales, and Fb- F>or=30 and Fb>or=90. Protocols completed by 150 adults participating in custody evaluations at a juvenile court setting, screened for randomness with a matched-pair Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (T. Millon, R. Davis, & C. Millon, 1997), were compared with 500 computer-generated all-random protocols and with three levels of partially random protocols. VRIN was the most effective scale in detecting uninterpretable random protocols; however, VRIN >or= 80 failed to identify 37% of them. Fb- F>or=30 and Fb>or=90 misidentified 41% of the 50%-65% random protocols as partially interpretable. Using the new scales, a decision algorithm was described that correctly classified 97%-100% of the protocols as interpretable, partially interpretable, or uninterpretable.
Insights
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) validity scales effectively identify random protocols. A new decision algorithm using these scales accurately classifies MMPI-2 protocols, improving accuracy in psychological assessments.
Area of Science:
- Psychological Assessment
- Psychometrics
- Forensic Psychology
Background:
- The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) is a widely used psychological assessment tool.
- Ensuring the validity of MMPI-2 protocols is crucial for accurate interpretation, especially in forensic settings.
- Existing validity scales may have limitations in detecting all types of invalid response patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of MMPI-2 validity scales in detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom protocols.
- To evaluate the performance of the Variable Response Inconsistency (VRIN) scale and other F and Fb scales.
- To develop and validate a decision algorithm for classifying MMPI-2 protocol interpretability.
Main Methods:
- Compared MMPI-2 protocols from 150 adults in juvenile court custody evaluations against computer-generated random and partially random protocols.
- Utilized the Variable Response Inconsistency (VRIN) scale, F scales, and Fb scales (Fb- F>or=30, Fb>or=90).
- Screened protocols for randomness using the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III).
Main Results:
- The VRIN scale was most effective at detecting uninterpretable random protocols, though not perfectly.
- Specific Fb scale cutoffs (Fb- F>or=30, Fb>or=90) showed a high misidentification rate for partially random protocols.
- A novel decision algorithm incorporating new scales achieved 97%-100% correct classification of protocols as interpretable, partially interpretable, or uninterpretable.
Conclusions:
- While VRIN is a valuable tool, it does not identify all random protocols.
- Certain Fb scale interpretations may lead to misclassification of protocol validity.
- The developed decision algorithm offers a significant improvement in accurately classifying MMPI-2 protocol interpretability, enhancing assessment reliability.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Dark Triad and Person Perception