Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Delay of insulin addition to oral combination therapy despite inadequate glycemic control: delay of insulin therapy
Gregory A Nichols1, Yuri H Koo, Sonali N Shah
1Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR 97227-1098, USA. greg.nichols@kpchr.org
Background:
Patients and providers may be reluctant to escalate to insulin therapy despite inadequate glycemic control.
Objectives:
To determine the proportion of patients attaining and maintaining glycemic targets after initiating sulfonylurea and metformin oral combination therapy (SU/MET); to assess insulin initiation among patients failing SU/MET; and to estimate the glycemic burden incurred, stratified by whether HbA(1c) goal was attained and maintained.
Design:
Longitudinal observational cohort study.
Subjects:
Type 2 diabetes patients, 3,891, who newly initiated SU/MET between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2000.
Measurements:
Subjects were followed until insulin was added, health plan disenrollment, or until 31 December 2005. We calculated the number of months subjects continued SU/MET therapy alone, in total, and during periods of inadequate glycemic control; the A1C reached during those time periods; and total glycemic burden, defined as the estimated cumulative monthly difference between measured A1C and 8%.
Results:
During a mean follow-up of 54.6 +/- 28.6 months, 41.9% of the subjects added insulin, and 11.8% received maximal doses of both oral agents. Over half of SU/MET patients attained but failed to maintain A1C of 8%, yet continued SU/MET therapy for an average of nearly 3 years, sustaining glycemic burden equivalent to nearly 32 months of A1C levels of 9%. Another 18% of patients never attained the 8% goal with SU/MET, yet continued that therapy for an average of 30 months, reaching mean A1C levels of 10%.
Conclusions:
Despite inadequate glycemic control, a minority of patients added insulin or maximized oral agent doses, thus, incurring substantial glycemic burden on SU/MET. Additional studies are needed to examine the benefits of rapid titration to maximum doses and earlier initiation of insulin therapy.
Insights
Many type 2 diabetes patients on sulfonylurea and metformin (SU/MET) therapy experience prolonged inadequate glycemic control. This leads to significant health burdens, highlighting the need for earlier insulin initiation.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Patients and healthcare providers exhibit reluctance in escalating to insulin therapy, even with suboptimal glycemic control.
- Type 2 diabetes management often involves a delay in intensifying treatment regimens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the proportion of patients achieving and sustaining glycemic targets with sulfonylurea and metformin oral combination therapy (SU/MET).
- To evaluate the rate of insulin initiation in patients who do not respond adequately to SU/MET.
- To quantify the glycemic burden experienced by patients, considering whether glycemic goals were met.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal observational cohort study involving 3,891 patients with type 2 diabetes initiating SU/MET.
- Patients were followed from their initiation date (1996-2000) until insulin initiation, disenrollment, or December 2005.
- Key metrics included duration of SU/MET use, HbA1c levels, and estimated cumulative glycemic burden.
Main Results:
- Over a mean follow-up of 54.6 months, 41.9% of patients initiated insulin, and 11.8% reached maximal oral agent doses.
- More than half of patients attained but failed to maintain an HbA1c below 8%, continuing SU/MET for an average of 3 years and accumulating significant glycemic burden.
- Approximately 18% of patients never reached the 8% HbA1c goal with SU/MET, continuing therapy for 30 months with mean HbA1c levels around 10%.
Conclusions:
- A significant proportion of patients on SU/MET experience prolonged hyperglycemia, incurring substantial glycemic burden due to delayed treatment intensification.
- The findings suggest a clinical inertia in escalating therapy, underscoring the need for further research into the benefits of earlier insulin initiation.
- Further investigation is warranted to explore strategies for optimizing treatment titration and timely insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes management.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into rapid-acting...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational