Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lagrange Multipliers: Two Constraints01:28

Lagrange Multipliers: Two Constraints

The method of Lagrange multipliers with two constraints is used to optimize a function subject to two independent constraints. In many applications, the objective function represents a quantity to be maximized or minimized, such as cost, area, distance, or energy. The two constraints represent requirements that the solution must satisfy, such as fixed volume, limited resources, or prescribed dimensions.For a function of three variables, each constraint forms a surface in three-dimensional space.
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I01:15

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I

Consider an electrical power grid, where stability is essential to prevent blackouts. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is a valuable tool for assessing system stability under varying load conditions or faults. By analyzing the closed-loop transfer function, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion helps determine whether the system remains stable.
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Optimization Problems01:26

Optimization Problems

Optimization problems often involve identifying maximum or minimum values under specific constraints. A well-known example is determining the longest horizontal pipe that can be moved around a right-angled corner, where a 3-meter-wide hallway meets a 2-meter-wide hallway. This scenario, common in architectural design and industrial transport, can be understood conceptually through geometric and trigonometric reasoning.To visualize the problem, consider the pipe as a straight line that touches...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alliance for clinical trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: a pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur).

BMC cancer·2024
Same author

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur).

Research square·2024
Same author

Modeling the Risk of Hearing Loss From Radiation Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2023
Same author

Modernization of safety environment for a dedicated beamline for proton ocular therapy.

Medical physics·2023
Same author

3D printing in brachytherapy: A systematic review of gynecological applications.

Brachytherapy·2023
Same author

The effect of dose gradients on gamma comparison insensitivity in patient specific QA comparisons.

Medical physics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Lexicographic ordering: intuitive multicriteria optimization for IMRT.

Kyung-Wook Jee1, Daniel L McShan, Benedick A Fraass

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, UH-B2C432, Box 0010, 1500 E. Medical Ctr. Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. wook@umich.edu

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|March 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Lexicographic ordering (LO) simplifies complex Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) inverse planning by prioritizing treatment goals hierarchically. This method streamlines decision-making for challenging cases, reducing iterative optimizations and improving efficiency.

More Related Videos

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) inverse planning involves multiple, often conflicting, objectives for target coverage and critical structure sparing.
  • Clinical decision-making requires balancing these objectives, typically through iterative optimization processes that are time-consuming and complex, especially with numerous planning goals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and evaluate a multicriteria optimization strategy, lexicographic ordering (LO), for addressing complex IMRT inverse planning problems.
  • To demonstrate LO's ability to manage a large number of planning goals by categorizing them into hierarchical priority levels.

Main Methods:

  • Lexicographic ordering (LO) was applied, involving the sequential optimization of planning goals based on predefined priority levels.
  • The LO approach was tested on two clinical cases: a prostate cancer case and a head and neck cancer case, with up to 23 planning goals.

Main Results:

  • The LO method successfully optimized comprehensive lists of planning goals using only a few priority levels, prohibiting tradeoffs between higher and lower priority objectives.
  • Optimization times per level were practical, ranging from 26 to 217 seconds, simplifying large-scale problem representations.
  • The LO approach effectively mimicked physician decision-making processes for conflicting planning goals.

Conclusions:

  • Lexicographic ordering offers an intuitive and efficient solution for multicriteria optimization in IMRT inverse planning.
  • This hierarchical strategy makes complex treatment planning more manageable and produces encouraging results for challenging clinical cases.