Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test for carotid artery stenosis: is it valid?
Kennith F Layton1, John Huston, Harry J Cloft
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. klayton@americanrad.com
Objective:
We believe that many studies in the literature show a falsely elevated specificity for carotid MR angiography (MRA) in the detection of high-grade stenosis. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that inclusion of a substantial proportion of normal carotid arteries in a study population will falsely elevate the specificity of MRA for confirming a high-grade carotid artery stenosis.
Materials And Methods:
Seventy-seven carotid arteries were evaluated in 63 patients suspected of having a high-grade carotid stenosis, and all vessels were evaluated with contrast-enhanced MRA. Two subgroups were created, and the specificity of MRA was calculated for each group using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. Group 1 included 44 vessels classified as high-grade stenosis on sonography and all were evaluated with DSA. To test our hypothesis, group 2 included the 44 carotid arteries from group 1 plus 33 carotid arteries classified as normal or minimally narrowed on sonography and MRA.
Results:
In group 1, the specificity of MRA for accurately confirming a high-grade stenosis was 29% for contrast-enhanced maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) images alone and 75% for contrast-enhanced axially reformatted source images as compared with DSA. When the 33 normal arteries from group 2 were added to the data set, the specificities increased to 70% and 89%, respectively.
Conclusion:
The calculated specificity of MRA as a confirmatory test for high-grade carotid stenosis is highly dependent on the proportion of normal carotid arteries included in the calculation. Based on our results, the specificity of MRA reported in the literature has likely been overstated because of spectrum bias.
Insights
Carotid MR angiography (MRA) specificity for high-grade stenosis may be overestimated due to spectrum bias. Including normal arteries in studies falsely elevates MRA specificity, suggesting literature values are likely overstated.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Vascular Imaging
Background:
- Carotid artery stenosis is a significant risk factor for stroke.
- Carotid MR angiography (MRA) is used to detect high-grade stenosis.
- Previous studies may have overestimated MRA specificity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if including normal carotid arteries falsely elevates MRA specificity for high-grade stenosis.
- To evaluate the impact of spectrum bias on MRA accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-seven carotid arteries were assessed using contrast-enhanced MRA.
- Two subgroups were analyzed: one with high-grade stenosis, another including normal arteries.
- Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as the gold standard for comparison.
Main Results:
- MRA specificity for high-grade stenosis was 29% (MIP) and 75% (axial) in the stenosis-only group.
- When normal arteries were included, MRA specificity increased to 70% (MIP) and 89% (axial).
Conclusions:
- MRA specificity for high-grade carotid stenosis is significantly influenced by the proportion of normal arteries in the study cohort.
- Literature values for MRA specificity in detecting high-grade stenosis may be inflated due to spectrum bias.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

