Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort.

Carisa Schneider1, Anupam Kharbanda, Richard Bachur

  • 1Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. carisa.schneider@gmail.com

Annals of Emergency Medicine
|March 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current Diagnostic Approaches and Challenges in the General Emergency Department Evaluation of Suspected Pediatric Appendicitis: A Qualitative Study.

MDM policy & practice·2026
Same author

Development of a neurologic deterioration risk score in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026
Same author

Improving Emergency Department Care for Children With Medium- and High-Risk Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Pediatrics·2025
Same author

Multicentre, retrospective cohort study protocol to identify racial and ethnic differences in acute kidney injuries in children and adolescents with diabetic ketoacidosis.

BMJ open·2024
Same author

Effectiveness of the Original Monovalent Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccines in Preventing Emergency Department or Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults With Disabilities: VISION Network, June 2021-September 2022.

Open forum infectious diseases·2023
Same author

Effectiveness of Monovalent and Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters Among Children Aged 6 Months-5 Years - VISION Network, United States, July 2022-June 2023.

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report·2023

The Alvarado and Samuel appendicitis scoring systems offer useful diagnostic information for children but are not sufficient alone for surgical decisions. Further evaluation is needed to improve accuracy in pediatric appendicitis diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Surgical Diagnostics
  • Clinical Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children.
  • Accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid complications and unnecessary surgeries.
  • Existing scoring systems like Alvarado and Samuel require validation in diverse pediatric populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Alvarado and Samuel appendicitis scoring systems.
  • To compare the efficacy of these scoring systems in a pediatric cohort.
  • To assess their utility in determining the need for surgery in pediatric appendicitis.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study of 588 patients aged 3-21 years evaluated for appendicitis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected by pediatric emergency medicine physicians before imaging or surgery.
  • Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values calculated for Alvarado and Samuel scores, including subgroup analysis for children under 10.

    • Main Results:

    • The Alvarado score (≥7) showed 72% sensitivity and 81% specificity; the Samuel score (≥6) showed 82% sensitivity and 65% specificity.
    • Positive predictive values were 65% for Alvarado and 54% for Samuel.
    • In children under 10, performance metrics were similar, with neither score demonstrating high positive predictive value.

    Conclusions:

    • Both Alvarado and Samuel scoring systems provide valuable diagnostic information for suspected pediatric appendicitis.
    • Neither scoring system, as currently proposed, offers sufficient positive predictive value to be used as the sole criterion for surgical intervention.
    • Further refinement or combination with other diagnostic tools may be necessary for optimal clinical decision-making in pediatric appendicitis.