Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Potential energy functions for protein design.

F Edward Boas1, Pehr B Harbury

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Beckman B437, Stanford, CA 94305-5307, USA.

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|March 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiopaque microsphere-hydrogel composite for extended-release intratumoral immunotherapy in a large animal model.

Drug delivery and translational research·2026
Same author

The Oncopig Large Animal Cancer Model: Perspectives for Advancing Interventional Oncology.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2025
Same author

Safety and Feasibility of Intra-Arterial Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Using an Emulsion of Ethiodized Oil plus Bumetanide in an Oncopig Model.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2025
Same author

Anatomy Insights and Key Pearls for Bronchial Artery Embolization.

Seminars in interventional radiology·2025
Same author

Bioinspired intratumoral infusion port catheter improves local drug delivery in the liver.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Computed Tomography Angiography and Conventional Angiography for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Cureus·2024
Same journal

Tomogram exploration through template matching and deep learning.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

A comparative review of cryo-electron ptychography: Biological applications and future perspectives.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Metabolic disruptions through a three-dimensional genomic lens.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Collective variable design for biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Polymer scaling in protein crowding: From dilute coils to semidilute meshes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Tuning the physicochemical properties of rationally designed protein-based biomolecular condensates.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
See all related articles

This review explores protein energy functions for simulations and design. Advances in molecular mechanics can unify these functions for next-generation protein design algorithms.

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology
  • Protein Science

Background:

  • Different potential energy functions are used for protein dynamics simulations, design, and structure prediction.
  • Despite underlying physical principles being the same, computational approaches necessitate distinct functions.
  • Advancements in computing power and algorithms suggest a unified approach is feasible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current energy functions in protein design.
  • To identify advances in molecular mechanics applicable to future protein design algorithms.
  • To focus on improving models for hydrophobic interactions, polarization, and hydrogen bonding.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing potential energy functions.
  • Analysis of molecular mechanics advancements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on specific physical interactions relevant to protein design.

    • Main Results:

    • Current protein design energy functions vary significantly.
    • Molecular mechanics offers potential improvements for next-generation design.
    • Enhanced modeling of hydrophobic effect, polarization, and hydrogen bonding is crucial.

    Conclusions:

    • A single, unified potential energy function is achievable for diverse protein computational tasks.
    • Future protein design algorithms can benefit from molecular mechanics innovations.
    • Improved physical interaction models are key to advancing protein design capabilities.