Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rating scales for depression in the elderly: external and internal validity.

Alex Kørner1, Lise Lauritzen, Kirsten Abelskov

  • 1Psychogeriatric Department, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark. alko@fa.dk

The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
|March 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(6)) demonstrated superior scalability and external validity in elderly individuals, outperforming longer versions and other depression scales. It is recommended for assessing depression in older adults, even alongside longer HAM-D scales.

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Diagnostic Apathia Scale predicts a dose-remission relationship of T-PEMF in treatment-resistant depression.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2014
Same author

Dose-remission of pulsating electromagnetic fields as augmentation in therapy-resistant depression: a randomized, double-blind controlled study.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2014
Same author

Psychometric analysis of the Melancholia Scale in trials with non-pharmacological augmentation of patients with therapy-resistant depression.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2014
Same author

The impact of the Danish Medico-Legal Council on the choice between treatment and punishment for non-psychotic offenders.

Nordic journal of psychiatry·2013
Same author

Mentally disordered non-psychotic criminal offenders--treatment instead of punishment.

Nordic journal of psychiatry·2013
Same author

Binary classification of ¹⁸F-flutemetamol PET using machine learning: comparison with visual reads and structural MRI.

NeuroImage·2012

Area of Science:

  • Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Psychometric Validation
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • Accurate depression assessment in the elderly is crucial, complicated by cognitive impairment.
  • Existing depression scales, including various Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) versions, require validation in diverse elderly populations.
  • Differentiating depression from dementia requires reliable and valid measurement tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the internal and external validity of multiple depression scales in elderly Danes.
  • Specifically assessed were the HAM-D(6), HAM-D(17), Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale (15- and 30-item), and Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia.
  • The study focused on populations with and without dementia.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two independent, blinded clinicians assessed participants from psychogeriatric clinics and a control group.
  • Concurrent and convergent validity were analyzed using correlation coefficients.
  • Internal validity was assessed via item response theory (IRT) analysis, including Mokken and Rasch analyses; scalability required a coefficient of homogeneity ≥ 0.40.
  • Main Results:

    • 145 elderly subjects (109 with depression, 36 controls) were included; 102 female, 43 male.
    • The HAM-D(6) was the only scale demonstrating total scalability in both cognitively intact and impaired elderly individuals.
    • The HAM-D(6) exhibited the strongest external validity when standardized against the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale.

    Conclusions:

    • The HAM-D(6) shows robust psychometric properties for assessing depression in the elderly.
    • Its scalability and external validity make it a reliable tool, even in the presence of cognitive impairment.
    • The HAM-D(6) warrants separate consideration for depression measurement in elderly populations, irrespective of longer HAM-D versions.