Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypercard coding system for the ACR Index for Radiological Diagnoses.

D L Renfrew1, S H Bass, M A Albanese

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Projections between the globus pallidus externa and cortex span motor and non-motor regions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Building collegiality: the real value of problem-based learning.

Medical education·2002
Same author

Offices of research in medical education: accomplishments and added value contributions.

Teaching and learning in medicine·2001
Same author

Toward setting a research agenda for systematic reviews of evidence of the effects of medical education.

Teaching and learning in medicine·2001
Same author

Application of the E. coli trp promoter.

Molecular biotechnology·2001
Same author

Journal publications in radiologic education: a review of the literature, 1987-1997.

Academic radiology·2001
Same journal

Optimizing and Personalizing PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Selection.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

The Importance of Distinguishing One- and Two-sided Hypothesis Tests.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Advances in Diabetes Medications and Patient Preparation for Oncologic FDG PET: <i>AJR</i> Expert Panel Narrative Review.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Incorporating BI-RADS v2025 Into Clinical Reporting.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Navigating Office Politics: Bullying, Gossip, and Workplace Incivility.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Author Disclosure of Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Submissions to <i>AJR</i>: Reflections From the <i>AJR</i> Editor in Chief.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

A new computer version of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Index for Radiological Diagnoses significantly improves coding efficiency and accuracy. This digital tool outperformed the traditional book format in a study of radiology professionals and students.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Background:

  • The American College of Radiology (ACR) Index for Radiological Diagnoses is a critical tool for standardizing medical coding.
  • Traditional book-based indexing systems can be time-consuming and prone to errors.
  • Advancements in computer technology offer potential for improving diagnostic coding processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a computer-based version of the ACR Index for Radiological Diagnoses.
  • To compare the efficiency, accuracy, and user confidence of the computer system against the traditional paperback version.
  • To assess the potential of a digital system to enhance radiological diagnostic coding.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a computer system integrating a graphics interface and a search mechanism, maintaining the Index's hierarchical structure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A comparative study involving 52 volunteers (radiology faculty, residents, and medical students) coding 30 cases each using both the computer system and the paperback Index.
  • Quantitative analysis of coding time, accuracy rates, and user confidence levels.

    • Main Results:

    • The computer system significantly reduced average case coding time (52.2 seconds vs. 64.5 seconds, p < .0001).
    • Coding accuracy was substantially higher with the computer system (96.4% vs. 90.4%, p < .0001).
    • Users reported higher confidence in diagnoses coded using the computer system (9.73 vs. 9.51 on a 1-10 scale, p = .0016).

    Conclusions:

    • The computer version of the ACR Index for Radiological Diagnoses demonstrably outperforms the paperback version in efficiency and accuracy.
    • This digital system offers a superior alternative for radiological diagnostic coding, enhancing both speed and reliability.
    • The findings support the integration of computer programs to optimize medical coding practices in radiology.