Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

08:05
Multiplexed Fluorometric ImmunoAssay Testing Methodology and Troubleshooting
Published on: December 12, 2011
Validating a custom multiplex ELISA against individual commercial immunoassays using clinical samples
Michael Liew1, Matthew C Groll, James E Thompson
1ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. liewm@aruplab.com
Biotechniques
|March 30, 2007
Summary
This study validates a multiplexed microELISA for nine key antigens, showing good correlation with clinical lab results. Methodological differences, particularly antibody variations, partly explain discrepancies between microELISA and individual immunoassays.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Immunology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Multiplexed antigen measurement presents significant clinical and methodological hurdles.
- Accurate simultaneous detection of multiple biomarkers is crucial for effective disease diagnosis and monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate a multiplexed sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (microELISA) for simultaneous detection of nine clinically relevant antigens.
- To compare the performance of the microELISA with established individual immunoassays and conventional ELISAs.
Main Methods:
- A microELISA array was developed and validated for nine antigens: AFP, PSA, CEA, CA 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, beta-hCG, LH, and FSH.
- Clinical samples (n≥44 per antigen) were analyzed using microELISA and compared against results from individual chemiluminescent immunoassays.
- Methodological comparisons were performed against conventional ELISAs using identical antibodies and reagents.
Main Results:
- The microELISA demonstrated good intra-assay (7.3% cv) and inter-assay (12.6% cv) variability.
- Correlation coefficients between microELISA and clinical laboratory results ranged from 0.76 to 0.99.
- Deming regression indicated four of nine microELISA assays were high-quality and statistically comparable to individual assays.
- Comparison with conventional ELISAs revealed five of eight assays were high-quality, suggesting antibody differences contribute to assay variations.
Conclusions:
- The validated microELISA offers a reliable method for multiplexed antigen detection.
- Assay performance is influenced by methodological factors, including antibody specificity and reagent choices.
- This multiplexing approach shows promise for improving efficiency in biomarker analysis.

