Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening: the bigger picture.

Laura Gibson1

  • 1Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities, London.

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
|March 30, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Connecting research and community: a methodological framework for investigating CMV transmission in childcare settings.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2025
Same author

Preconception and Prenatal Medicaid Coverage for Medicaid-Insured Births.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2025
Same author

Exploring Web-Based Support for Suicidal Ideation in the Scottish Population: Usability Study.

JMIR formative research·2025
Same author

A Scleroderma and Raynaud's UK (SRUK) national survey to explore rheumatologists' awareness, approaches to diagnosis and management and training needs within systemic sclerosis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2025
Same author

An ultra-endurance event leads to changes in circulating regulatory T-cells, CD4+ naïve and CD8+ effector memory T-cells in the 48 h post-race recovery period.

European journal of applied physiology·2024
Same author

Design, creation, and use of the Test Us Bank (TUB) COVID-19 sample biorepository.

BMC infectious diseases·2024
Same journal

Effect of artificial intelligence on nursing documentation and patient safety.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Strategies for responding to anger from patients, relatives and carers.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Nurses' role in detecting early and subtle signs of patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Pulse oximetry: exploring its role, limitations and challenges in clinical practice.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Anorexia nervosa: identification and management by non-specialist nurses.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Skin and soft tissue abscesses: assessment and management.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
See all related articles

Prospective parents often undergo antenatal screening, but the reliability of information from healthcare staff regarding test abnormalities is questioned. This study evaluates the accuracy and clarity of communicated results during prenatal diagnostic procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Patient Communication

Background:

  • Antenatal screening tests are frequently utilized by expectant parents.
  • The communication of abnormal results from these tests is a critical aspect of prenatal care.
  • Understanding the reliability of this information is essential for informed decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of information provided by healthcare staff to prospective parents regarding antenatal screening results.
  • To evaluate the clarity and comprehensibility of explanations concerning potential fetal abnormalities.
  • To identify potential gaps or inconsistencies in the communication process during prenatal diagnostics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction surveys.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of healthcare provider communication protocols and training materials.
  • Comparative analysis of reported information versus actual test findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Preliminary findings suggest variability in the accuracy and clarity of information conveyed.
    • Some prospective parents report receiving information that is difficult to understand or potentially misleading.
    • Discrepancies between communicated risks and confirmed diagnoses require further investigation.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a need to enhance the quality of information provided to prospective parents during antenatal screening.
    • Standardized communication guidelines and improved training for healthcare professionals are recommended.
    • Ensuring reliable and clear information empowers parents to make informed choices about prenatal care and potential interventions.