Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attentional dynamics in lexical and language identification: evidence from eye-tracking.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Concreteness Effects of Constituents in Naming Mandarin Compounds.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

The role of semantic features in word production.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Processing Mandarin Chinese classifiers as a lexico-syntactic feature during noun phrase production.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Distinct connectivity patterns in clusters of inferior parietal cortex: from a cognitive control hub to modulating cortical areas.

Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Characteristics, crack use, housing situation and psychosocial problems of people in the open drug scene in cologne, Germany - results of a cross-sectional survey.

Harm reduction journal·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

Bilingual language control: an event-related brain potential study.

Ingrid K Christoffels1, Christine Firk, Niels O Schiller

  • 1Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, The Netherlands. ichristoffels@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Brain Research
|March 30, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Bilinguals experience language switching costs equally across both languages. However, mixed language contexts slow down the first language (L1) more than the second language (L2).

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Bilingual language processing involves managing multiple languages.
  • Understanding language switching mechanisms is crucial for comprehending bilingual cognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural and behavioral costs associated with switching between first (L1) and second (L2) languages in bilingual speakers.
  • To examine the influence of cognate status and language context (blocked vs. mixed) on language switching.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) and naming latencies were recorded from unbalanced German (L1)-Dutch (L2) bilinguals.
  • Participants performed a picture-naming task under blocked (monolingual) and mixed (alternating) language conditions.
  • Cognate status of translation equivalents was manipulated to assess phonological activation.

Main Results:

  • Cognate facilitation was observed in both L1 and L2, indicating phonological activation of the non-target language.
  • Language switching incurred similar costs for both L1 and L2, with ERP modulations observed.
  • Mixed language contexts led to slower L1 naming latencies and distinct ERP effects compared to L2.

Conclusions:

  • Bilingual language control involves both sustained and transient components.
  • Language switching costs are symmetrical, but mixed contexts differentially impact L1 processing.
  • Findings contribute to theories of bilingual language production and control.