Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Hedvig Hricak1, Peter L Choyke, Steven C Eberhardt

  • 1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. hricakh@mskcc.org

Radiology
|March 30, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer workforce-a global crisis: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Estimating total and diagnosed global cancer incidence and stage distribution from 1990 to 2050: a simulation-based analysis of 17 cancers.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Estimating global cancer survival and mortality from 1990 to 2050: a simulation-based analysis of 17 cancers.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Estimating the impact of scaling up workforce personnel on global cancer mortality from 2030 to 2050: a simulation-based analysis of 17 cancers and 18 personnel types.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

World Health Assembly Resolution <i>Strengthening Medical Imaging Capacity</i>: Impact on Medical Imaging Globally.

Radiology·2026
Same author

The LELEX initiative to enhance cancer imaging communication: development of a consensus-based structured reporting template and lexicon for general oncologic imaging.

Radiologia brasileira·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Accurate prostate cancer characterization requires integrating anatomic, functional, and molecular imaging. Current imaging guidelines are limited for primary tumors, but established protocols exist for assessing distant spread, aiding detection, staging, and treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • No consensus on imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation.
  • Ultrasonography used for biopsy guidance and brachytherapy.
  • Endorectal MRI aids local tumor extent assessment; MR spectroscopic imaging provides aggressiveness data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Synthesize anatomic, functional, and molecular imaging for accurate prostate cancer characterization.
  • Review the optimal role of modern imaging in prostate cancer detection, staging, treatment planning, and follow-up.
  • Provide a multidisciplinary perspective on current and future imaging applications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current imaging modalities including ultrasonography, MRI, CT, and PET/CT.
  • Discussion of imaging for primary tumor evaluation, staging, and treatment follow-up.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of evidence-based guidelines for assessing distant spread.

    • Main Results:

    • MRI with superparamagnetic nanoparticles shows promise for lymph node metastases but is research-based.
    • CT is reserved for advanced disease evaluation.
    • PET/CT use is limited for primary disease but accepted in follow-up; bone scanning and CT have PSA-level guidelines for metastasis assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrating diverse imaging techniques is crucial for improved prostate cancer characterization.
    • Established guidelines exist for assessing distant spread, though practice changes are slow.
    • Modern imaging plays a vital role across the prostate cancer care continuum.