Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Femoral neck prostheses].

C Stukenborg-Colsman1

  • 1Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Deutschland. christine.stukenborg@annastift.de

Der Orthopade
|March 31, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patients' Burden Using Microprocessor-stance-and-swing-control Knee-ankle-foot Orthoses and Outcomes Compared to Those With Prior Traditional Knee-ankle-foot-orthosis.

Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal·2024
Same author

Experts' Perceived Patient Burden and Outcomes of Knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (Kafos) Vs. Microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot Orthoses (Mp-sscos).

Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal·2023
Same author

[Surgical procedures for the correction and stabilization of pes planovalgus].

Der Orthopade·2020
Same author

Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?

Musculoskeletal surgery·2019
Same author

Subjective outcome following neurostimulator implantation as drop foot therapy due to lesions in the central nervous system-midterm results.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2019
Same author

[Rupture of the tendon of the tibialis anterior muscle : Etiology, clinical symptoms and treatment].

Der Unfallchirurg·2017
Same journal

[Fast-track hip and knee joint arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Preoperative management in fast-track arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Perioperative management in fast-track arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Pain therapy and anaesthesiological procedures in fast-track arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Discharge readiness versus discharge-Results of the PROMISE study].

Der Orthopade·2022
See all related articles

Cementless femoral neck prostheses offer advantages like preserving the femoral neck but have lower survival rates than standard stems. Revision surgery is feasible, but careful patient selection and surgeon experience are crucial for successful outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Cementless femoral neck prostheses present an alternative to standard stems in hip arthroplasty.
  • These implants preserve the femoral neck and avoid opening the diaphyseal marrow cavity, potentially simplifying future revision surgeries.
  • However, their survival rates are currently lower compared to cementless standard stems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the survival rates and clinical outcomes of cementless femoral neck prostheses.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of femoral neck prostheses versus standard stems.
  • To highlight the surgical considerations and patient selection criteria for femoral neck prostheses.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of survival rates between cementless femoral neck prostheses and cementless standard stems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of surgical techniques and potential complications associated with femoral neck prosthesis implantation.
  • Assessment of the feasibility of revision surgery following femoral neck prosthesis failure.

    • Main Results:

    • Cementless femoral neck prostheses demonstrate lower survival rates than cementless standard stems.
    • Preservation of the femoral neck and the diaphyseal marrow cavity are key advantages.
    • Revision to a standard stem is possible after femoral neck resection.

    Conclusions:

    • While offering specific benefits, cementless femoral neck prostheses require careful patient selection due to lower survival rates and technical demands.
    • Surgeon experience in total hip arthroplasty is essential for minimizing surgical errors and optimizing outcomes.
    • Informed consent regarding the pros and cons of different implant models is critical for patient management.