Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy01:29

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

An Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a diagnostic procedure in which an endoscopist uses a flexible, lighted endoscope to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The procedure includes visualizing the oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine, the duodenum.
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management01:29

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, or GERD, is a persistent medical condition that affects many individuals worldwide. Its clinical manifestations can vary greatly, making diagnosis and management challenging for healthcare professionals. The following is a comprehensive overview of the clinical manifestations, assessment, and management strategies for GERD.
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management01:26

Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management

Patients with esophageal strictures often experience a range of symptoms. Initially, they may have difficulty swallowing solid foods, which can progress to include liquids. Additional symptoms may involve chest pain or discomfort, regurgitating food and fluids, heartburn, unintentional weight loss, coughing or choking during meals, and hoarseness.
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP01:26

Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic procedure that combines endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and treat conditions related to the bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and gallbladder. This procedure is beneficial for identifying and addressing blockages, gallstones, strictures, and tumors within the biliary or pancreatic systems. ERCP is both diagnostic and therapeutic, offering the ability to visualize and treat identified problems in one session.
Patient...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gastric antral webs in adults: A case series characterizing their clinical presentation and management in the modern endoscopic era.

World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy·2017
Same author

Effect of propofol anesthesia on force application during colonoscopy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2014
Same author

Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2012
Same author

Esophageal foreign bodies and food impactions.

Gastroenterology & hepatology·2011
Same author

Large colorectal polyps: endoscopic management and rate of malignancy: does size matter?

Journal of clinical gastroenterology·2010
Same author

The risks associated with GI endoscopy: how much do we really know?

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
06:46

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring

Published on: December 14, 2020

Minimizing endoscopic complications--gastric and esophageal physiologic testing.

Stanley B Benjamin1, Kathleen A Maher

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, Northwest, Washington, DC 20007, USA. benjamis@gunet.georgetown.edu

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
|April 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This review details minimizing endoscopic risks during esophageal function tests. It covers historical context, traditional evaluations, and Bravo pH monitoring for improved patient safety.

More Related Videos

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
09:04

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
06:46

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring

Published on: December 14, 2020

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
09:04

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Esophageal Physiology

Background:

  • Esophageal physiologic testing is crucial for diagnosing gastrointestinal motility disorders.
  • Minimizing complications during endoscopic procedures is a key concern for patient safety.
  • Understanding the historical evolution of these tests aids in appreciating current advancements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of minimizing endoscopic complications.
  • To detail traditional methods for evaluating esophageal and gastric function.
  • To discuss Bravo pH testing in the context of safety and efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical data and literature on esophageal diagnostic procedures.
  • Description of established techniques for esophageal and gastric evaluation.
  • Analysis of Bravo pH testing protocols and associated complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Identification of potential endoscopic risks associated with various diagnostic tests.
  • Comparison of complication profiles between traditional methods and newer technologies like Bravo pH testing.
  • Emphasis on strategies for risk mitigation and enhanced patient care.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to best practices in esophageal physiologic testing can significantly reduce complication rates.
  • Bravo pH testing offers a valuable, minimally invasive option when performed correctly.
  • Continuous evaluation and refinement of techniques are essential for improving safety in gastrointestinal diagnostics.