Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Avoiding medicolegal complications.

Peter B Cotton1, James W Saxton, Maggie M Finkelstein

  • 1Medical University of South Carolina, Digestive Disease Center, 210 CSB, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Clinical Science Building, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. cottonp@musc.edu

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
|April 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Riding (and driving) the endoscopy express over 7 decades.

iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights·2026
Same author

ERCP credentialing.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2024
Same author

Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Rise in First-Time ERCP for Benign Indications >1 Year After Cholecystectomy Is Associated With Worse Outcomes.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2024
Same author

Consensus-based development of a causal attribution system for post-ERCP adverse events.

Gut·2022
Same author

Informed consent.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2022

Endoscopic procedures carry risks, but clear communication and thorough documentation can minimize patient lawsuits. Adhering to standards and managing events systematically are key to reducing legal risks.

Area of Science:

  • Medical procedures
  • Patient safety
  • Legal medicine

Background:

  • Endoscopic procedures, while common, are associated with potential complications.
  • Patient lawsuits following endoscopic procedures are infrequent but can arise from communication breakdowns.
  • Effective risk management is crucial in minimizing litigation associated with medical interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore factors influencing the likelihood of lawsuits after endoscopic procedures.
  • To identify strategies for mitigating legal risks in endoscopy practice.
  • To emphasize the importance of communication and documentation in patient safety.

Main Methods:

  • Review of factors contributing to litigation in medical malpractice cases.
  • Analysis of the role of patient-physician communication in legal outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of documentation standards and event management protocols in healthcare.

    • Main Results:

    • Poor communication with patients and families significantly increases the likelihood of lawsuits.
    • Adherence to accepted medical standards and best practices reduces legal risks.
    • Systematic documentation of patient education, consent, and procedural events is vital.

    Conclusions:

    • Minimizing the risk of lawsuits in endoscopy requires a multi-faceted approach.
    • Prioritizing clear communication and comprehensive documentation can prevent legal complications.
    • Implementing standardized event management protocols enhances patient safety and reduces liability.