Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic errors in analytical measurement results.

D Brynn Hibbert1

  • 1School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. b.hibbert@unsw.edu.au

Journal of Chromatography. A
|April 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advanced methods for assessment of risks of false decisions in analytical chemistry (testing) laboratories - A review.

Talanta·2025
Same author

Confirmation of ethanol administration in racing greyhounds by LC-MS-MS.

Drug testing and analysis·2024
Same author

Chemical data evaluation: general considerations and approaches for IUPAC projects and the chemistry community (IUPAC Technical Report).

Pure and applied chemistry. Chimie pure et appliquee·2023
Same author

Correction to "Machine Learning Color Feature Analysis of a High Throughput Nanoparticle Conjugate Sensing Assay.

Analytical chemistry·2023
Same author

Machine Learning Color Feature Analysis of a High Throughput Nanoparticle Conjugate Sensing Assay.

Analytical chemistry·2023
Same author

Interlaboratory comparison of the intensity of drinking water odor and taste by two-way ordinal analysis of variation without replication.

Journal of water and health·2022

Understanding measurement bias and recovery is crucial for accurate scientific results. This study explores methods to address bias, including correction and uncertainty expansion, aiding in robust method validation and precise measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Metrology
  • Measurement Science

Background:

  • Bias and recovery are key concepts in measurement science.
  • The Guide To Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) provides a framework for handling systematic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and discuss concepts of bias and recovery.
  • To describe approaches for managing uncorrected bias in measurements.
  • To explore the utility of bias components in method validation.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of definitions for bias and recovery.
  • Exploration of GUM recommendations for systematic effects.
  • Analysis of bias components (run, laboratory, method).
  • Consideration of bias in multivariate calibration.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Bias can be corrected or accounted for by expanding measurement uncertainty.
  • Defining bias components aids in method validation.
  • Estimating run bias simplifies uncertainty estimation.
  • Multivariate calibration biases require quantification and minimization.

Conclusions:

  • Effective management of bias is essential for reliable measurement results.
  • Bias components offer a structured approach to method validation.
  • Proper handling of bias improves the accuracy and reliability of scientific data.