Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CT colonography: interpretative performance in a non-academic environment.

D Burling1, S Halligan, J Atchley

  • 1University College Hospital, London, UK.

Clinical Radiology
|April 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Picosecond laser filament-guided electrical discharges in air at 1 kHz repetition rate.

Optics express·2024
Same author

Dynamics of Nanosecond Laser Pulse Propagation and of Associated Instabilities in a Magnetized Underdense Plasma.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Correction to: Feasibility of intraoperative ultrasound of the small bowel during Crohn's disease surgery.

Techniques in coloproctology·2023
Same author

Transport of an intense proton beam from a cone-structured target through plastic foam with unique proton source modeling.

Physical review. E·2022
Same author

Influence of spatial-intensity contrast in ultraintense laser-plasma interactions.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Wake dynamics of air filaments generated by high-energy picosecond laser pulses at 1 kHz repetition rate.

Optics letters·2021
This summary is machine-generated.

Radiologists performing computed tomography (CT) colonography in non-academic settings showed variable accuracy, averaging 75%. While interpretation time was comparable to experienced peers, individual performance varied widely, highlighting the need for ongoing assessment beyond experience alone.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Computed tomography (CT) colonography is a widely used colorectal cancer screening tool.
  • Assessing the interpretative accuracy and reporting time of radiologists in routine clinical practice is crucial for quality assurance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interpretative accuracy and reporting time of radiologists performing CT colonography in non-academic clinical settings.
  • To compare performance metrics against experienced and recently trained radiologists in an academic environment.

Main Methods:

  • Thirteen radiologists from seven non-academic centers interpreted 15 colonoscopically validated CT colonography cases.
  • Performance (accuracy and interpretation time) was compared to aggregated data from experienced and recently trained academic radiologists.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the effect of experience on accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Individual accuracy ranged from 53% to 93%, with a mean accuracy of 75%, significantly lower than experienced radiologists (88%) but not different from recently trained ones.
    • Interpretation time was comparable to experienced radiologists (12.4 min vs. 11.7 min) but shorter than recently trained radiologists.
    • A significant positive correlation was found between prior experience and accuracy, with no performance plateau observed.

    Conclusions:

    • On average, non-academic radiologists' CT colonography accuracy is similar to those recently trained but shows wide individual variability.
    • Performance often falls below published meta-analysis averages, indicating a need for standardized competency assessment.
    • While experience enhances accuracy, it is not solely sufficient to guarantee competence in CT colonography interpretation.