Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery
Sindhu K Srinivas1, David M Stamilio, Erika J Stevens
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. ssrinivas@obgyn.upenn.edu
Objective:
To identify a group of clinical factors that could be used to accurately predict failure in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).
Methods:
We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of women who were offered VBAC from 1996 to 2000 in 17 community and university hospitals. We collected information about maternal history and outcomes of the index pregnancy. We used univariable and multivariable statistical methods to develop a multivariable prediction model for the outcome of VBAC failure.
Results:
A total of 13,706 patients attempted VBAC, with a failure rate of 24.5%. Six variables were significantly associated with VBAC failure in our final logistic regression model: gestational age at delivery, maternal age, maternal race, labor type (spontaneous, augmented, or induced), history of vaginal delivery, and cephalopelvic disproportion or failed induction (combined variable) as prior cesarean indication. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve is 0.717. To achieve a sensitivity of approximately 75%, a false-positive rate of approximately 40% would result.
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that significant clinical variables (prelabor and labor) cannot reliably predict VBAC failure.
Level Of Evidence:
II.
