Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Size Matters: Measurement of Capsule Diameter in Cryptococcus neoformans
Published on: February 27, 2018
Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections: a systematic review
T Khawcharoenporn1, A Apisarnthanarak, L M Mundy
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasart University Hospital, Pratumthani, 12120, Thailand. anapisarn@yahoo.com
Abstract:
Non-neoformans cryptococci have been generally regarded as saprophytes and rarely reported as human pathogens. However, the incidence of infection due to these organisms has increased over the past 40 years, with Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus, together, responsible for 80% of reported cases. Conditions associated with impaired cell-mediated immunity are important risks for non-neoformans cryptococcal infections and prior azole prophylaxis has been associated with antifungal resistance. The presence of invasive devices was a significant risk factor for Cryptococcus laurentii infection (adjusted OR = 8.7; 95% CI = 1.48-82.9; p = 0.003), while predictors for mortality included age > or =45 years (aOR = 8.4; 95% CI = 1.18-78.82; p = 0.004) and meningeal presentation (aOR = 7.0; 95% CI = 1.85-60.5; p= 0.04). Because clinical manifestations of non-neoformans cryptococcal infections are most often indistinguishable from Cryptococcus neoformans, a high index of suspicion remains important to facilitate early diagnosis and prompt treatment for such infections.
Insights
Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections, often caused by Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus, are increasingly reported. Invasive devices and impaired immunity are risk factors, necessitating a high index of suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- Non-neoformans cryptococci, previously considered harmless saprophytes, are emerging as significant human pathogens.
- Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus account for 80% of non-neoformans cryptococcal infections.
- Impaired cell-mediated immunity and prior azole prophylaxis are identified risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the epidemiology and risk factors associated with non-neoformans cryptococcal infections.
- To identify predictors of mortality in patients with non-neoformans cryptococcal infections.
- To emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment due to overlapping clinical presentations with Cryptococcus neoformans.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients with non-neoformans cryptococcal infections.
- Statistical analysis including adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and confidence intervals (CI) to determine risk factors and mortality predictors.
- Comparison of clinical manifestations with Cryptococcus neoformans infections.
Main Results:
- The presence of invasive devices was a significant risk factor for Cryptococcus laurentii infection (aOR = 8.7).
- Mortality predictors included age ≥45 years (aOR = 8.4) and meningeal presentation (aOR = 7.0).
- Clinical presentations are often indistinguishable from Cryptococcus neoformans infections.
Conclusions:
- Non-neoformans cryptococci represent a growing threat, particularly in immunocompromised individuals and those with invasive devices.
- Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial, requiring a high index of suspicion due to non-specific clinical signs.
- Further research into optimal management strategies for these emerging fungal infections is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Antifungal Agents
Candidiasis
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Antiprotozoal Agents
