Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

The Effect of Interfacial Chemical Bonding in TiO2-SiO2 Composites on Their Photocatalytic NOx Abatement Performance
Published on: July 4, 2017
Interfacial electron transfer in metal cyanide-sensitized TiO2 nanoparticles
James A Harris1, Kevin Trotter, Bruce S Brunschwig
1Molecular Materials Research Center, Beckman Institute, MC 139-74, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Abstract:
Electroabsorption (Stark) spectroscopy has been used to study the charge-transfer absorption from a transition-metal-cyanide complex to a TiO2 nanoparticle. Transition-metal cyanide/TiO2(particle) systems were synthesized using FeII(CN)(6)4-, RuII(CN)6(4-), MoIV(CN)(8)4-, and WIV(CN)8(4-). On formation of the M(CN)n4-/TiO2(particle) system, a new metal-to-particle charge-transfer (MPCT) absorption band is observed in the 390-480 nm region. Analysis of the absorption spectra suggests that the TiO2 level involved in the MPCT transition resides at significantly higher energy than the bottom of the conduction band and that the electronic coupling between the two metal centers is the dominant factor determining the position of the MPCT band maximum. The average charge-transfer distances determined by Stark spectra range from 4.1-4.7 A. The observation of relatively short charge-transfer distances leads to the conclusion that the MPCT absorption is from the transition-metal cyanide center to a level that is localized on the Ti atom bound to a nitrogen end of the [O2Ti-N-C-M(CN)x] system. The electronic coupling, Hab, calculated for a two state model is similar to values observed in dinuclear metal complexes.
Related Concept Videos
Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview
Formation of Complex Ions
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

