Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: a look into the future
Ralph J Damiano1, Richard B Schuessler, Rochus K Voeller
1Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. damianor@wudosis.wustl.edu
Insights
Surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation has evolved from the invasive maze procedure to less invasive ablation techniques. Further research is needed to understand atrial fibrillation mechanisms and optimize ablation strategies for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- The Cox maze procedure, introduced in 1987, effectively treats atrial fibrillation and prevents stroke.
- The complexity and invasiveness of the maze procedure have driven the development of less invasive surgical alternatives.
- Numerous new surgical approaches utilizing various energy sources have emerged for atrial fibrillation treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution of surgical treatments for atrial fibrillation.
- To address the current confusion regarding optimal lesion patterns and energy sources in atrial fibrillation ablation.
- To highlight the need for a deeper understanding of atrial fibrillation mechanisms and ablation technology's impact.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical and contemporary surgical techniques for atrial fibrillation.
- Analysis of different energy sources used in ablation procedures.
- Discussion of the impact of ablation on atrial hemodynamics and electrophysiology.
Main Results:
- The development of less invasive ablation techniques as alternatives to the maze procedure.
- Significant confusion exists in the literature regarding the best ablation strategies.
- Lack of understanding of atrial fibrillation mechanisms and ablation effects contributes to this confusion.
Conclusions:
- Further research into atrial fibrillation mechanisms is crucial for advancing treatment.
- Continued investigation into the safety and efficacy of ablation devices is necessary.
- Optimizing surgical and ablation strategies requires a comprehensive understanding of atrial electrophysiology.
Abstract:
The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation began in 1987, when Dr. James Cox introduced the maze procedure. This operation proved to be extremely effective in curing atrial fibrillation and preventing its most dreaded complication, stroke. However, many surgeons found the operation to be too difficult and invasive. Over the last 5 to 10 years, various groups have tried to develop less invasive approaches using a number of different energy sources to create linear lines of ablation to replace the surgical incisions. This has led to a plethora of new operations for this arrhythmia. There is significant confusion in the literature at the present time as to what is the best lesion pattern and what is the best energy source. It is our feeling that a great deal of this confusion is due to our lack of understanding of the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation and the effect of ablation technology on atrial hemodynamics and electrophysiology. Future progress will require a better understanding of this arrhythmia and continued research into the safety and efficacy of ablation devices.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

