Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery.

A N Healey¹, C P Primus, M Koutantji

¹Imperial College, London, UK. a.healey@imperial.ac.uk

Quality & Safety in Health Care

|April 4, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.

Quality & safety in health care·2009

Same author

How willing are patients to question healthcare staff on issues related to the quality and safety of their healthcare? An exploratory study.

Quality & safety in health care·2008

Same author

Defining the technical skills of teamwork in surgery.

Quality & safety in health care·2006

Same author

Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.

Ergonomics·2006

Same author

The Coping with Asthma Study: a randomised controlled trial of a home based, nurse led psychoeducational intervention for adults at risk of adverse asthma outcomes.

Thorax·2005

Same author

Coping and psychological adjustment in recent-onset inflammatory polyarthritis: the role of gender and age.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2005

Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

See all related articles

Distractions and interruptions frequently disrupt surgical teams, impacting patient safety. This study developed a method to measure these events, aiding in surgical debriefing and improving operating room protocols.

Area of Science:

Surgical safety research
Human factors in medicine
Operating room management

Background:

Enhancing surgical safety requires tools to evaluate work systems.
Distractions and interruptions are critical safety considerations in high-risk professions.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantify distraction and interruption occurrences within the sterile surgical team in urology.
To assess the impact of external factors on surgical team workflow.

Main Methods:

Direct observation of surgical team behavior and task activities.
Utilizing an ordinal scale to rate the severity of observed distractions and interruptions.
Recording the frequency and impact of events on team involvement.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

High frequency of distractions and interruptions observed.
Events originated from equipment, procedural, and environmental issues, including communication devices (telephones, bleepers) and conversations.
Varied degrees of work interference were noted.

Conclusions:

The developed method shows potential for measuring work interference in surgery.
This approach can help identify sources of distraction for surgical team debriefing.
Raising awareness of interference origins can improve postoperative reviews and enhance surgical safety.