A prospective study of response to name in infants at risk for autism

Aparna S Nadig1, Sally Ozonoff, Gregory S Young

  • 1University of California Davis M.I.N.D. Institute, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. aparna.nadig@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

Insights

A decreased response to name by 12 months suggests developmental issues, but doesn't identify all cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or developmental delays. This early indicator may reflect traits of the broader autism phenotype in infants.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Early Childhood Development

Background:

  • Early identification of developmental delays and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Assessing infant responses to their names is a potential, non-invasive screening method.
  • Understanding the predictive value of early behavioral markers is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a diminished response to one's name at 12 months of age as a screening tool for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and other developmental delays.
  • To determine the predictive accuracy of failing to respond to name in infancy for later developmental outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, longitudinal study design was employed, following infants at high risk for ASD and a control group.
  • Participants included 6- and 12-month-old infants at risk for ASD and age-matched controls.
  • Infants underwent an experimental task to elicit response-to-name behavior, with follow-up assessments using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Mullen Scales of Early Learning.

Main Results:

  • At 12 months, 100% of control infants responded to name within two calls, compared to 86% of infants at risk for ASD.
  • Children who failed the response-to-name task at 12 months had a high likelihood (75%) of identified developmental problems by 24 months.
  • The specificity of failing to respond to name was high (0.89 for ASD, 0.94 for any delay), but sensitivity was moderate (0.50 for ASD, 0.39 for any delay).

Conclusions:

  • A lack of response to name by 12 months strongly suggests potential developmental abnormalities but is not a universal predictor for all children at risk.
  • Not all infants who are later diagnosed with ASD or developmental delays fail to respond to their name.
  • Poor response to name in infancy may represent a characteristic of the broader autism phenotype.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos