Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026
08:08
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Neuroradiology fellowship match: year 4 applicants' perceptions
Dima A Hammoud1, David M Yousem, Pamela W Schaefer
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|April 7, 2007
Summary
Fellowship candidates found the neuroradiology match process fair and were satisfied with outcomes. However, perceived disadvantages led to only lukewarm support for continuing the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP).
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Radiology
- Fellowship Training
Background:
- The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) has been utilized for neuroradiology fellowship selection since 2002.
- This study focuses on the 2005 fellowship selection cycle.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate fellowship candidates' perspectives on the NRMP match process for neuroradiology positions.
- To gather feedback on the perceived fairness, satisfaction, and challenges associated with the match.
Main Methods:
- A web-based survey was electronically distributed to all neuroradiology fellowship candidates for the July 1, 2005, start date.
- 113 candidates responded, representing a 73.9% response rate.
- Open-ended comments were also collected via the survey.
Main Results:
- 75.7% of candidates perceived the NRMP system as fair, and 86.0% were satisfied with their match outcome.
- 88.8% matched with one of their top three choices, but only 54.5% recommended continuing the match.
- Perceived advantages included program exploration and fairness; disadvantages involved costs, interview duration, and perceived favoritism towards internal candidates.
Conclusions:
- The majority of neuroradiology fellowship candidates view the match process favorably regarding fairness and satisfaction.
- Despite positive perceptions, significant disadvantages temper overall support for the NRMP's continuation.
- Program directors should consider these candidate-reported data when evaluating future selection processes in radiology subspecialties.
