Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
An adaptive Simon Two-Stage Design for Phase 2 studies of targeted therapies
Cheryl L Jones1, Eric Holmgren
1Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA. jones.cheryl@gene.com
Abstract:
The field of specialized medicine and clinical development programs for targeted cancer therapies are rapidly expanding. The proposed Phase 2 design allows for preliminary determination of efficacy that may be restricted to a particular sub-population defined by biomarker status (presence/absence). The design is an adaptation of the Simon Two-Stage Design. We provide examples where the adaptation can result in substantial savings in sample size and thus potentially lead to greater efficiency in decision making during the drug development process.
Insights
This study introduces an adaptive Phase 2 clinical trial design for targeted cancer therapies. This approach enhances efficiency by potentially reducing sample size and speeding up decision-making in drug development.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Specialized medicine and targeted cancer therapies are rapidly advancing.
- Biomarker-driven patient stratification is crucial for personalized oncology.
- Efficient clinical trial designs are needed to accelerate drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose an adaptive Phase 2 clinical trial design for targeted cancer therapies.
- To evaluate the design's ability to determine preliminary efficacy in biomarker-defined subpopulations.
- To demonstrate potential sample size savings and improved decision-making efficiency.
Main Methods:
- Adaptation of the established Simon Two-Stage Design.
- Application to Phase 2 clinical trials for targeted cancer therapies.
- Focus on biomarker status for sub-population definition.
Main Results:
- The proposed design allows for preliminary efficacy determination in specific patient subgroups.
- Examples demonstrate substantial savings in required sample size.
- The adaptive approach can lead to greater efficiency in clinical decision-making.
Conclusions:
- The adapted Simon Two-Stage Design offers an efficient approach for Phase 2 trials of targeted cancer therapies.
- Biomarker-based sub-population analysis enhances precision and resource utilization.
- This design facilitates faster and more informed decisions in the drug development pipeline.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Site-Targeted

