Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking for craniosynostosis.

Irene M J Mathijssen¹, Eric Arnaud

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Unité de chirurgie crânio-faciale, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

|April 7, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of Prime Editing Efficiency in Human Immortalized MSC-TERT Cells with Osteogenic Potential for Modeling <i>FGFR2</i>-Linked Craniosynostosis.

The CRISPR journal·2026

Same author

European Reference Networks as core health structures where referring genetic newborn screening positive infants: an innovative operational research framework.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Same author

Towards consensus on the treatment of congenital craniofacial conditions: the discussion section of a doctoral thesis.

Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery·2026

Same author

Cranial nerves involvement in craniosynostosis: a systematic review.

Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery·2026

Same author

Chiari malformation in syndromic and non-syndromic lambdoid craniosynostosis: a longitudinal cohort study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026

Same author

Giant parieto-occipital encephaloceles: always a dismal prognosis? A case report and review of the literature.

Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery·2026

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Benchmarking craniofacial malformations care improves quality by identifying best practices and comparing outcomes. A pilot study on craniosynostosis suggests a minimum patient volume per year may reduce complications.

Area of Science:

Craniofacial Surgery
Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

Benchmarking is recognized as a method to enhance the quality of care for craniofacial malformations.
This process facilitates the identification of best practices among participating centers, leading to the development and implementation of new protocols and guidelines.
It also enables comparative analysis of patient outcomes across different institutions.

Purpose of the Study:

To conduct the first international pilot study on benchmarking for craniosynostosis within the International Society for Craniofacial Surgery (ISCFS).
To establish a preliminary set of recommendations for improving care quality through benchmarking.

Main Methods:

Involved a controlled number of specialized centers with multidisciplinary teams.
Focused on craniosynostosis as the condition for the pilot benchmarking study.

Related Experiment Videos

Analyzed data to identify potential parameters for quality assessment.

Main Results:

Preliminary findings suggest that a minimum number of patients operated on per year may be a valid parameter for decreasing morbidity.
The study identified the need for controlled centers and multidisciplinary teams as prerequisites for effective benchmarking.

Conclusions:

Benchmarking holds significant potential for improving the quality of care in craniofacial malformations.
Establishing minimum patient volumes and ensuring multidisciplinary team involvement are key considerations for future benchmarking initiatives in craniosynostosis surgery.