Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Human Brucellar Spondylodiscitis
Published on: May 23, 2021
Follow-up MR imaging in patients with pyogenic spine infections: lack of correlation with clinical features
T J Kowalski1, K F Layton, E F Berbari
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. kowalski.todd@mayo.edu
Background And Purpose:
Follow-up MR imaging examinations are increasingly used to monitor response to treatment in patients with spine infection. We aim to describe follow-up MR imaging examination findings 4-8 weeks after diagnosis and initiation of treatment of spine infections and to compare with clinical findings.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty-three patients with spinal infection and available baseline and 4-8-week follow-up MRIs were included in this retrospective cohort study. Baseline and follow-up MR imaging were graded by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to clinical characteristics and outcome. Clinical findings and outcomes were independently obtained by retrospective review of the medical record.
Results:
Compared with baseline MR imaging examinations, follow-up MR imaging more frequently demonstrated vertebral body loss of height (26/33 [79%] versus 14/33 [47%]; P < .001) and less frequently demonstrated epidural enhancement (19/32 [59%] versus 29/33 [88%]; P = .008), epidural canal abscess (3/32 [9%] versus 15/33 [45%]; P = .001), and epidural canal compromise (10/32 [31%] versus 19/33 [58%]; P = .008). Most follow-up MR imaging examinations demonstrated less paraspinal inflammation and less epidural enhancement compared with baseline. However, vertebral body enhancement, disk space enhancement, and bone marrow edema more often were equivocal or appeared worse compared with baseline. Twenty-one of 32 (66%) follow-up MR imaging examination overall grades were considered improved, 5 (16%) were equivocal, and 6 (19%) were worse. No single MR imaging finding was associated with clinical status.
Conclusion:
Soft tissue findings, not bony findings, should be the focus of clinicians interpreting follow-up MR imaging results. No single MR imaging parameter was associated with the patients' clinical status.
Insights
Follow-up MRI for spine infections shows decreased epidural enhancement but persistent bony changes. Soft tissue findings, not bone, are key for monitoring treatment response, as no single MRI parameter correlated with clinical status.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is crucial for monitoring spine infection treatment.
- Understanding follow-up MR imaging findings is essential for accurate treatment assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe MR imaging findings 4-8 weeks after spine infection diagnosis and treatment initiation.
- To compare these follow-up MR imaging findings with clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 33 patients with spine infections.
- Analysis of baseline and 4-8 week follow-up MR imaging.
- Independent review of clinical data and outcomes.
Main Results:
- Follow-up MR imaging showed decreased epidural enhancement and abscesses but increased vertebral body height loss.
- Soft tissue inflammation and epidural enhancement were reduced compared to baseline.
- Bony findings like vertebral enhancement and edema were often equivocal or worsened.
- Overall, 66% of follow-up MRIs indicated improvement, but no single finding correlated with clinical status.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians should prioritize soft tissue findings over bony findings when interpreting follow-up MR imaging for spine infections.
- No individual MR imaging parameter reliably predicts clinical status in treated spine infections.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis
Viral Meningitis
