Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Splitting the difference: how does the brain code reward episodes?

Brian Knutson1, G Elliott Wimmer

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. knutson@psych.stanford.edu

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|April 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digital episodic memory tools for the identification of amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and an exploratory meta-analysis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Contributions of the basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens to sustaining not just initiating cognitive effort.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Brain activity reveals how wildlife imagery evokes engagement on social media.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Females have shorter scalp-to-cortex distances and receive stronger TMS electrical fields: Implications for clinical treatment.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Brain activity explains message effectiveness: A mega-analysis of 16 neuroimaging studies.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

The impact of affective congruence on charitable giving.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Synchrony and Reciprocity in Rhythmic Interaction.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Leveraging Salt Fortification Platforms to Address Multiple-Micronutrient Deficiencies in Africa: A Policy Opportunity.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study differentiates reward processing phases, finding the nucleus accumbens predicts reward cues and the mesial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) signals reward prediction errors. This improves understanding of brain reward systems.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Psychiatry

Background:

  • Reward processing is crucial for learning and decision-making.
  • Existing models, like temporal difference (TD) learning, often use a single error term, potentially oversimplifying neural mechanisms.
  • Neural correlates of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation may be distinct.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if distinct neural substrates underlie reward prediction and prediction error signals.
  • To compare the explanatory power of a single versus a split error term model in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized fMRI data from a monetary incentive delay task.
  • Developed and compared computational models with single versus split reward error terms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed neural activation patterns associated with reward cues and outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • The nucleus accumbens was associated with gain prediction in response to reward cues.
    • The mesial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) was associated with gain prediction errors in response to outcomes.
    • A split error term model provided a better fit to the fMRI data compared to a single error term model.

    Conclusions:

    • Reward processing involves distinct neural computations for prediction and error signaling.
    • The nucleus accumbens and MPFC play specialized roles in reward learning.
    • This refined model offers insights into psychiatric disorders and lesion effects on reward processing.