Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical conclusion validity. Multiple inferences in rehabilitation research.

K J Ottenbacher1

  • 1State University of New York, Buffalo 14214.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Life Expectancy in Pre-Frail and Frail States with and without Disability: 18-Years of Follow-Up Data from the HEPESE Study Using the Markov Chain Method.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2023
Same author

Hospital readmission in persons with stroke following postacute inpatient rehabilitation.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2012
Same author

Frailty and cognitive impairment as predictors of mortality in older Mexican Americans.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2012
Same author

Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities.

Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association·2006
Same author

Concurrent validity of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disabilities Inventory in children with developmental disabilities and acquired brain injuries.

Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics·2002
Same author

Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation in patients with cerebrovascular impairment.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2002

Researchers can control statistical errors in rehabilitation studies using adjusted Bonferroni methods. These techniques maintain statistical power while reducing Type I errors, enhancing research validity.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Multiple statistical inferences in rehabilitation research can inflate Type I error rates.
  • The traditional Bonferroni method, while common, is often too conservative, reducing statistical power.
  • Overly conservative methods can lead to inaccurate conclusions in clinical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the problem of multiple statistical inferences and Type I error rates in rehabilitation research.
  • To present adjusted Bonferroni methods that control Type I errors while preserving statistical power.
  • To improve the statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of the Bonferroni method and its limitations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presentation of adjusted or sharpened Bonferroni methods.
  • Application of these methods to control Type I errors in multiple comparisons.

    • Main Results:

    • Adjusted Bonferroni methods effectively control Type I error rates.
    • These adjusted methods maintain statistical power, unlike the traditional Bonferroni approach.
    • The proposed adjustments are computationally simple and broadly applicable.

    Conclusions:

    • Adjusted Bonferroni methods offer a superior approach to managing multiple comparisons in rehabilitation research.
    • Implementing these procedures enhances the statistical conclusion validity of study findings.
    • Researchers can achieve robust results by employing appropriate multiple comparison techniques.