Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Study designs for dependent happenings.

M E Halloran1, C J Struchiner

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Emory University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA 30329.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disgust as an emotional driver of vaccine attitudes and uptake? A mediation analysis.

Epidemiology and infection·2019
Same author

On the origin and timing of Zika virus introduction in Brazil.

Epidemiology and infection·2017
Same author

The contribution of neighbours to an individual's risk of typhoid outcome.

Epidemiology and infection·2015
Same author

Seven challenges for model-driven data collection in experimental and observational studies.

Epidemics·2015
Same author

Household transmissibility of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus, China, February to May 2013 and October 2013 to March 2014.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2015
Same author

Assessing the impact of travel restrictions on international spread of the 2014 West African Ebola epidemic.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2014
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Interventions for infectious diseases can have direct and indirect effects. This study presents a framework to differentiate and analyze these effects in disease transmission dynamics.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Sir Ronald Ross defined "dependent happenings" in 1916, where incidence is influenced by prevalence.
  • This characteristic is common in infectious diseases, impacting transmission dynamics.
  • Interventions can yield both direct benefits and indirect population-level effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a conceptual framework for analyzing intervention effects in "dependent happenings."
  • To differentiate and account for both direct and indirect effects of public health interventions.
  • To provide a foundation for designing studies that measure these distinct intervention impacts.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development.
  • Analysis of direct vs. indirect effects in disease transmission models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of four distinct study designs.

    • Main Results:

    • The framework distinguishes between direct protective effects and indirect transmission-reducing effects of interventions.
    • Four study designs are proposed to isolate and quantify these separate effects.
    • The conceptualization aids in understanding the full impact of public health interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding direct and indirect effects is crucial for evaluating intervention efficacy in infectious diseases.
    • The proposed framework offers a method for designing studies to measure these effects accurately.
    • This approach can inform more effective public health strategies for controlling infectious diseases.