Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A model for incorporating historical controls into a meta-analysis.

C B Begg1, L Pilote

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021.

Biometrics
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel random-effects model for meta-analysis. It accurately estimates treatment effects when combining comparative and historical control studies, accounting for potential bias and heterogeneity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testosterone-to-estradiol ratio and platelet thromboxane release in ischemic heart disease: the EVA project.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2022
Same author

Association of IRF4 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs12203592 with melanoma-specific survival.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

A risk prediction model for the development of subsequent primary melanoma in a population-based cohort.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same author

A Phase II trial of 8 weeks of degarelix for prostate volume reduction: Efficacy and hormonal recovery.

Brachytherapy·2018
Same author

Excess psychosocial burden in women with diabetes and premature acute coronary syndrome.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2017
Same author

Functional melanoma-risk variant IRF4 rs12203592 associated with Breslow thickness: a pooled international study of primary melanomas.

The British journal of dermatology·2017

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Meta-analysis often combines diverse study designs.
  • Integrating noncomparative, historical control studies presents unique challenges.
  • Accurate estimation of treatment effects is crucial for evidence-based medicine.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for estimating treatment effects in meta-analysis.
  • To incorporate both comparative and noncomparative historical control studies.
  • To address potential bias and heterogeneity in treatment effects.

Main Methods:

  • A random-effects model was employed.
  • Baseline effects were modeled as random, while treatment effects were constant.
  • The model determines the appropriate contribution of historical studies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed model effectively estimates treatment effects across mixed study designs.
  • The method allows for the determination of historical study contributions.
  • Extensions accommodate bias testing and heterogeneous treatment effects.

Conclusions:

  • The developed random-effects model provides a robust framework for meta-analysis.
  • This approach enhances the validity of treatment effect estimation.
  • It offers a flexible tool for handling diverse study types and potential biases.