Related Experiment Videos
Directionality of evolution at molecular and organismic levels
M A Livshits1, M V Volkenstein
1Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Bio Systems
|January 1, 1991
Summary
Molecular evolution theories by Eigen and Kimura are compared. Eigen
Area of Science:
- Molecular Evolution
- Theoretical Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Established theories of molecular evolution, including Eigen's and Kimura's, offer different perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms.
- Eigen's theory emphasizes direct genotype selection in macromolecular evolution.
- Kimura's neutral theory posits molecular-level degeneracy between genotype and phenotype.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare and contrast the molecular evolution theories of Eigen and Kimura.
- To elucidate the fundamental differences in their explanations of evolutionary processes at the molecular level.
- To propose a novel model for evolution on a fitness landscape.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of Eigen's and Kimura's theories.
- Conceptualization of a fitness landscape model.
- Theoretical examination of selection constraints and evolutionary rates.
Main Results:
- Eigen's theory posits direct selection acting on genotypes.
- Neutral theory highlights the non-deterministic relationship between genotype and phenotype at the molecular scale.
- The proposed model demonstrates that evolutionary history and structural dynamics significantly accelerate the rate of selection.
Conclusions:
- The study clarifies key distinctions between Eigen's and Kimura's molecular evolution frameworks.
- A new theoretical model is presented for understanding evolution within fitness landscapes.
- Selection constraints, shaped by prior evolutionary stages, are shown to be potent drivers of evolutionary rate.