Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Nonvalidation of reported genetic risk factors for acute coronary syndrome in a large-scale replication study
Thomas M Morgan1, Harlan M Krumholz, Richard P Lifton
1Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06510, USA. morgan_t@kids.wustl.edu
Context:
Given the numerous, yet inconsistent, reports of genetic variants being associated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there is a need for comprehensive validation of ACS susceptibility genotypes.
Objective:
To perform an extensive validation of putative genetic risk factors for ACS.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Through a systematic literature search of articles published before March 10, 2005, we identified genetic variants previously reported as significant susceptibility factors for atherosclerosis or ACS. Restricting our analysis to white patients to reduce confounding from racial admixture, we identified 811 patients who presented from March 2001 through June 2003 with ACS at 2 Kansas City, Mo, university-affiliated hospitals. During 2005-2006, we genotyped the 811 patients along with 650 age- and sex-matched controls for 85 variants in 70 genes and attempted to replicate previously reported associations. We further explored possible associations without prior assumption of specific risk models and used the Sign test to search for weak associations.
Main Outcome Measures:
Compare each prespecified gene variant associated with ACS risk among cases and controls. A surplus of associations would imply that some are associated with ACS.
Results:
Of 85 variants tested, only 1 putative risk genotype (-455 promoter variant in beta-fibrinogen) was nominally statistically significant (P = .03). Only 4 additional genes were positive in model-free analysis. Neither number of associations was more frequent than expected by chance, given the number of comparisons. Finally, only 41 of 84 predefined risk variants were even marginally more frequent in cases than in controls (with 1 tie), representing a 48.8% "win rate" (95% confidence interval, 38.1%-59.5%) for the collective risk genotypes (P = .91, Sign test).
Conclusions:
Our null results provide no support for the hypothesis that any of the 85 genetic variants tested is a susceptibility factor for ACS. These results emphasize the need for robust replication of putative genetic risk factors before their introduction into clinical care.
More Related Videos
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
06:04Pulse-Wave Velocity, Flow-Mediated Dilation, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Population with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies