Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Factors influencing children's performances of a steady-state bimanual coordination task.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2009

Same author

Specific instructions are important for continuous bimanual drumming in adults with Down syndrome.

Down's syndrome, research and practice : the journal of the Sarah Duffen Centre·2006

Same author

Gait transitions are not dependent on changes in intralimb coordination variability.

Journal of motor behavior·2003

Same author

Bimanual coordination dynamics in adults with Down syndrome.

Motor control·2002

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

Developmental differences in the use of visual information during a continuous bimanual coordination task.

Dawn A Lantero¹, Shannon D Robertson Ringenbach

¹Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, Texas State University, San Marcos 78666-4616, USA. dl28@txstate.edu

Journal of Motor Behavior

|April 13, 2007

Summary

Children around age 8 are shifting from using movement (kinesthetic) to sight (visual) feedback for coordination tasks. This developmental shift impacts how they control movements, requiring further research.

More Related Videos

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Published on: March 21, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Published on: March 21, 2025

Area of Science:

Developmental psychology
Motor control
Human movement science

Background:

Motor skill development involves the integration of sensory feedback.
Children's reliance on different sensory systems changes during development.
Understanding feedback reliance is crucial for explaining motor learning and coordination.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how visual information influences bimanual coordination in children aged 4, 6, and 8, and adults.
To identify age-related differences in motor control strategies during a circle-drawing task.
To explore the transition in sensory feedback reliance during childhood.

Main Methods:

Participants (children aged 4, 6, 8, and adults) performed a steady-state bimanual circle-drawing task.
The amount of visual information available was manipulated.
Coordination patterns and variability were analyzed at self-selected speeds.

Main Results:

All age groups maintained in-phase coordination.
Diverse strategies for maintaining coordination emerged across age groups.
No clear age-dependent improvement in consistency was observed; the 8-year-olds were not consistently more stable than younger children.

Conclusions:

Children around age 8 appear to be transitioning from kinesthetic to visual feedback dominance for motor control.
This developmental transition may explain observed coordination strategies and variability.
Further research is needed to elucidate the roles of visual and kinesthetic feedback in pediatric motor development.