Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Couplings between electronic transitions in a subsystem formulation of time-dependent density functional theory
1Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland. johannes.neugebauer@phys.chem.ethz.ch
Abstract:
A subsystem formulation of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) within the frozen-density embedding (FDE) framework and its practical implementation are presented, based on the formal TDDFT generalization of the FDE approach by Casida and Wesolowski [Int. J. Quantum Chem. 96, 577 (2004)]. It is shown how couplings between electronic transitions on different subsystems can be seamlessly incorporated into the formalism to overcome some of the shortcomings of the approximate TDDFT-FDE approach in use so far, which was only applicable for local subsystem excitations. In contrast to that, the approach presented here allows to include couplings between excitations on different subsystems, which become very important in aggregates composed of several similar chromophores, e.g., in biological or biomimetic light-harvesting systems. A connection to Forster- and Dexter-type excitation energy coupling expressions is established. A hybrid approach is presented and tested, in which excitation energy couplings are selectively included between different chromophore fragments, but neglected for inactive parts of the environment. It is furthermore demonstrated that the coupled TDDFT-FDE approach can cure the inability of the uncoupled FDE approach to describe induced circular dichroism in dimeric chromophores, a feature known as a "couplet," which is also related to couplings between (nearly) degenerate electronic transitions.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

