The randomized discontinuation trial: a phase II design to assess growth-inhibitory agents

Walter M Stadler1

  • 1Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland, MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. wstadler@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

Insights

The randomized discontinuation trial effectively evaluates anticancer drugs by selecting patients likely to benefit and assessing disease stabilization. This innovative design overcomes challenges in early-phase clinical development for growth inhibitory agents.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Many new anticancer drugs target growth inhibition, posing challenges for phase II clinical trials.
  • Standard endpoints like tumor shrinkage are often not met, and time to progression is difficult to predict without concurrent controls.
  • Identifying patient populations who will benefit from novel agents in early development remains a significant hurdle.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) design.
  • To address the limitations of traditional phase II trial designs for growth inhibitory anticancer agents.
  • To demonstrate how RDT can identify patient benefit and assess disease stabilization.

Main Methods:

  • The RDT involves an initial treatment period for all patients.
  • Patients with objective responses continue therapy.
  • Non-progressing patients are randomized to continue or discontinue therapy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner after a run-in period.

Main Results:

  • The RDT design allows for the selection of a patient cohort most likely to benefit from the investigational drug.
  • It provides a rigorous method for evaluating the disease-stabilizing activity of novel anticancer agents.
  • This design overcomes the challenges of unpredictable null hypothesis times and poorly defined patient populations.

Conclusions:

  • The randomized discontinuation trial offers significant advantages for early-phase anticancer drug development.
  • It effectively addresses challenges related to objective response and time-to-progression endpoints.
  • RDT facilitates rigorous evaluation of disease stabilization and identification of patient benefit, despite certain limitations.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview01:26

Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview

Drugs, the chemical agents used in diagnosing, treating, or preventing diseases, undergo a four-phase process of development: pharmaceutic, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic.
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...