Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why weight?

Karl M Kjer1, Zuzana Swigonova, John S LaPolla

  • 1Rutgers, Cook College, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. kjer@aesop.rutgers.edu

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
|April 17, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<b>Taxonomic revision of the <i>Nylanderia guatemalensis</i> species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Neotropics, with implications for conservation and invasion biology</b>.

Zootaxa·2026
Same author

Nylanderia of the World, Part IV: Taxonomic contributions to the American Clade I of New World Nylanderia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Zootaxa·2025
Same author

New species of Coccidella Hambleton and Rhizoecus Kunckel d'Herculais from South America (Hemiptera: Rhizoecidae).

Zootaxa·2025
Same author

Trophobiosis between a new species of <i>Acropyga</i> (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) and new <i>Neochavesia</i> (Hemiptera, Xenococcidae) from Peru, and establishment of the <i>Acropygasmithii</i> species-group.

ZooKeys·2023
Same author

A Neotropical complex of <i>Ripersiella</i> species (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha, Rhizoecidae) collected from the nests of <i>Acropyga</i> ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).

ZooKeys·2023
Same author

Distinguishing Symbiotic Partners of Acropyga Ants from Free-Living Soil Inhabitants.

Neotropical entomology·2022

Evaluating phylogenetic data weighting schemes, this study found common methods perform poorly. More complex weighting strategies show promise but lack consistent superiority, supporting varied approaches to phylogenetic analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Molecular Evolution
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • The optimal weighting of phylogenetic data remains a significant debate in evolutionary biology.
  • Differential weighting schemes are proposed to improve phylogenetic accuracy, but consensus on the best approach is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of various differential weighting schemes for phylogenetic data using mitochondrial genomes.
  • To compare commonly used weighting methods against more complex, novel approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized mitochondrial genome data from 17 mammalian species with well-established phylogenies.
  • Assessed multiple weighting schemes: successive weighting, transversion weighting, codon-based, amino acid coding, 6-parameter, pseudoreplicate reweighting, and tri-level weighting.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Commonly employed weighting schemes demonstrated the poorest performance with the tested mitochondrial data.
  • Several complex weighting schemes yielded better results, though no single method was consistently superior.
  • Findings suggest that equally weighted parsimony and maximum likelihood methods are supported if avoiding differential weighting.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of weighting scheme significantly impacts phylogenetic inference, particularly with mitochondrial data.
  • Complex weighting schemes warrant further exploration for phylogenetic data analysis.
  • Results provide evidence supporting both equally weighted methods and differential weighting as data exploration tools.